Must be the ITM Group. Thats how they play. Kicked me out for “not participating ” bc of my insistence that a detective committed perjury against me at trial. So, I got violated by probation. Now there is a review into that cop’s false testimony. So, we’ll see.

Just a guess here…

ITM Group?

Not a lawyer… But,

Was the violation simply for having what was considered porn on your pc or was it because you had not yet attained permission from your treatment provider to view porn. It’s been awhile since I’ve read those conditions.

My first PO told me he was going to revoke because I was watching something on Youtube when he stopped by, saying they considered it porn. I called his bluff – turned, put my hands behind my back, and said “Let’s go.” I was (and remain) more than willing to do a few weeks in jail to hear him explain (and the court to likely agree) that Youtube is pornographic. He backed off with a “next time…” warning and the matter never came up again.

Ditto my stupid “treatment” group. They wanted me to sign a pledge to not use the internet for any reason. I refused, saying modern life is impossible without it and it would apply to phones and ATM cards, depending on the extremes they want to take it. They threatened to kick me out and that I’d be revoked. Again, go ahead.

The next week, they modified the pledge to “unauthorized” purposes. I refused again, asking who determines what’s authorized and what isn’t, how do they let me know, and how (and how often) changes are made. No answers, just a claim that it’s only a formality and not that big a deal, just sign it. Again, I refused. Told them if it’s not big a deal to sign, then it’s not a big deal NOT to sign, either. 4 years later, it hasn’t come up again.

I filed grievances against that firm with every mental health organization they belong to for violations of their various codes of ethics and standards of practice last October (held off on complaining to the state licensing board, pending the results). They’ve been fast-tracking me through their stupid program ever since.

One size does not fit all.

Adult porn is also considered texts from ones spouse if that is pornographic in nature. Nude pics of oneself is also considered Pornography.

One who is on s.o. probation can be violated, and have been, for both.

I am grateful that the ‘One’ who Lied in Court and Illegally caused state incarceration on Me, is Now Dying a Slow Death…..Karma is a Bitch!

When I was still on paper , about 12 years ago, the FDLE came out with the strict zero tolerance policy, they were violating people, not just for nudie mags, but for having any R-rated move ( well any movie for that fact ) that had ANY nudity in it.

that was just before this lawsuit. I had to go through my movie collection and trash most of them out of fear.

A few years ago, there was a bill to prevent someone on probation from possessing any pornography but that didn’t fly.

I hope this answers your question:

In Kasischke v. State, 991 So.2d 803, 815 (Fla.2008), the Florida Supreme Court examined the statute that prohibits sexual offenders on probation from possessing pornographic or obscene material and determined that “[a]n offender does not violate this condition unless the obscene, pornographic, or sexually stimulating' material at issue is relevant to thedeviant behavior pattern.'”