Also, Looking back at Jacobs comment, he said no Registered sex offender. This case was 1973 when there was no such thing as the registry. So you are both partly right.

Joe
Thanks for posting that. It is ALWAYS a good idea for someone to do research before they speak. I looked up what you listed and area correct

The Halloween Killer and Lisa Ann French.
https://www.thescarechamber.com/halloween-killer/

The problem is, that is ONE creep out of Millions of people in the US. So we ALL have to suffer for something that happened before some on here were even born.

Lisa French was never harmed by a convicted sex offender. Nothing in our registration laws or Halloween laws would have protected her from her assailant.

Gerald Turner (French’s assailant) had no priors before that night, therefore wouldn’t have been on the registry had it existed back then.
Around 25 years had passed before the first Halloween restrictions were enacted, during which the only Halloween crimes against children reported were those killed by drunk drivers and a few killed in gang shootings.
If trick-or-treating is so dangerous because “sex offenders may be out unsupervised”, then the responsible parental move would be to not allow their children to do it.

Lisa French. Fond-du-lac Wisconsin. 1973

AND, we all got a chance before we were sentenced to bargin with the prosecutor right? And none of this was added AFTER we were sentenced, AFTER we finished our sentences right?

And every other felon or EX felon has to also do these things as well right? So since EVERYONE else also HAS to do all this stuff as well, it cannot be discrimatory right?

Also, what the Hell does Halloween have to do with those who did NOT have a charge involving minors?

It’s never happened. There is not one case of registered sex offender ever having used Halloween to abuse or exploit a child.

Had there ever been such an incident, sheriffs and media outlets would be sure to remind you of it every year.