Comments on: After Court Ruling, FDLE Seeks Legislative Help To Clarify Sex Offender 'Internet Identifier' Law

By: JV

JV — Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:57:22 +0000

In reply to Jew Man. Agreed. I've been wondering the same thing myself for years.

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:09:04 +0000

In reply to Lnix.

please contact legal@floridaactioncommittee.org with details.

By: Lnix

Lnix — Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:01:04 +0000

So, this is being enforced. My husband has an iphone which i gave him…hubby went to do his quarterly registraiton, and they arrested him saying that he must have email because of the smart phone. He doesnt have email on his phone but since they gave him such a hard time last week (they made him come back this week with his smart phone) we added his own itunes account and email addresss in the morning. And now he is sitting in jail, the first registry violation in 17 years. SMH. He is looking at a third degree felony.

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:21:41 +0000

In reply to Mike.

In 1997 Sen Burt from Ormand Beach started the crusade against Sex Offenders with 97-299. The laws written give FDLE the power as a state police agency.

What it does not reflect is that it does not give FDLE the right to Retroactively go back to a previous court adjudicated crime and change the courts sentence.
The Federal Government does not have a sex offender registration.

In Carr the court hung everything on 2250 b travel.

Use your lap tops and read all the statutes. Read the sentencing guidelines. We can win this if we go after the “Violation of State STATUTORY Constitutional Law.”

By: JZ

JZ — Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:16:11 +0000

“The requirement for these individuals to register internet information has been an important tool for law enforcement in combatting the exploitation of minors.” Talk is cheap, where are your statistics that your internet trolling has had any effect, other than with your illegal sting operations?

By: Derek W Logue of OnceFallen.com

Derek W Logue of OnceFallen.com — Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:43:19 +0000

The headline should be amended to read the blind asks the blind for help down the street. Neither the idiots who passed this law or the morons tasked to enforce this trip understand how it works to begin with. Way to go FloriDUH!

By: DJ

DJ — Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:33:35 +0000

In reply to Karen. Thanks for the main thread repost. This is most certainly unconstitutinal & I'm hopeful this has swift resolve w/ the outcome to be in our favor.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 08 Dec 2016 13:39:56 +0000

In reply to Mike.

Another note: FDLE is an investigative agency. They are Florida’s FBI. Now the question begs to be answered….Why is an investigative agency trying to implement law? This is NOT FDLE job. This is for the Florida Legislature to accomplish. Granted, this will be how FDLE tries to accomplish it’s new mission, but for Commissioner Rick Swearingen to make it a….”top legislative priority for him in 2017″. Police ARE NOT supposed to be involved with making policy OR law!! Think about this!!!!! The tail is trying to wag the dog.

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:37:18 +0000

Similar requirements have been completely struck down in other states as an unconstitutional violation of free speech. Those courts said a person has the right to remain anonymous when exercising free speech…lets see what these jerks come up with…

By: TWMJR

TWMJR — Thu, 08 Dec 2016 01:40:28 +0000

Do we have to worry about this crap again???? Give up you stupid bureaucratic lawmaking idiots. Quick making our lives more miserable while you try to make yourselves look good. If I could vote all of you would be out of a job. I can’t believe that the politicians think they know it all when in fact they refuse to know the truth.