Comments on: Appellee Brief filed in Henry – And it’s strong!

By: CherokeeJack

CherokeeJack — Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:42:35 +0000

Here is my timeline as I lived it.
#1 There was no registry
#2 I was arrested, sentenced and sent to prison. (Still no registry)
#3 A few days before being released from prison, the registry started and I was applied to it retroactively.
#4 There was no timeline of when registry would last, but later told it was for life in Florida.
#5 Superhero’s by the name F.A.C formed to fight for justice, peace and the American way.
#6 Decades later, we continue to fight to get relief, with some wins, and some losses.
#7 What will the future give us?

By: David

David — Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:28:55 +0000

Texas resident here, hoping for a favorable outcome. It’s been 14 years since the offense and the registrant hasn’t reoffended and is living a productive life. So much for the “frightening and high” recidivism rate. He should be removed from the registry and allowed to live with his child and wife … period.

By: FAC-3

FAC-3 — Sun, 09 Nov 2025 21:24:05 +0000

In reply to No Hope. Of course a win will benefit us. If it’s unconstitutional in the 11th Circuit it’s not constitutional in Florida, Alabama and Georgia.

By: Bo

Bo — Sun, 09 Nov 2025 02:30:19 +0000

Justice Thurmond Marshall, former Supreme Court Judge, wrote “if the First Amendment means anything, it means that a state has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch.” We are so afraid to question the validity of the more recent outlandish findings on this subject. There is little difference when illegal immigrants are separated from their children. It is beyond reason as a human rights and constitutional issue that someone who held CP, tried, punished, treated, and released 14-years ago, should be kept from his children, especially in a two-adult household, without other imposing issues that make it unsafe to do so. Where is the humanity of our lawmakers, civil servants, and judges?

By: No end

No end — Sat, 08 Nov 2025 17:15:24 +0000

In reply to Derek W. Logue of OnceFallen.com. Makes sense now. Thank you guys

By: TS

TS — Sat, 08 Nov 2025 16:57:17 +0000

It for this very reason why the people don’t trust the legal system or the government…making decisions without being transparent to the people as to why the one judge queried their colleagues about an en banc hearing without any prompt by either party to the case and then those polled decided to grant the en banc hearing. It reeks of holier than thou because I wear a robe and make decisions you peons must obey (on paper at least and though states et al have disobeyed court orders and opinions for ages).

Unless of national security implications, of which this case is not and neither are the machinations within the 11th CCOA, all related moves should be made open for all to see, read, and understand without fail. It is the prerogative of the court to do as they see fit, but the founding fathers wouldn’t be happy with this court membership for this action.

By: Derek W. Logue of OnceFallen.com

Derek W. Logue of OnceFallen.com — Sat, 08 Nov 2025 16:26:15 +0000

In reply to No end. If Henry loses, rest assured some Florida politician will try to pass a similar law, since they seem to have run out of new ideas to torture Registered Persons.

By: Bwj

Bwj — Sat, 08 Nov 2025 12:49:56 +0000

In reply to No end. Sounds like it would ensure that Florida could not pass a law doing that same thing. I don't know if would apply to a registrant who is on probation.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 08 Nov 2025 12:18:34 +0000

In reply to No end. We are in the same circuit as Alabama.

By: RM

RM — Sat, 08 Nov 2025 04:14:56 +0000

In reply to No end. A win in the 11th Circuit would mean that such a law could never be imposed here in Florida.