<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are Sex Offenders Human?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/are-sex-offenders-human/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/are-sex-offenders-human/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Advocate		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/are-sex-offenders-human/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Advocate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=5420#comment-4873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bill - that is exactly what I was going to post also!  One of my pet peeves - that word is mis-used so much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; that is exactly what I was going to post also!  One of my pet peeves &#8211; that word is mis-used so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/are-sex-offenders-human/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=5420#comment-4872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was able to learn a few bits of information from this post, however the one thing that bothers me about it is the phrase: &quot;the ex-wife of a convicted pedophile&quot; in the 3rd to last paragraph.  There is no such thing as a &quot;convicted pedophile&quot;.   It should have been worded &quot;convicted sex-offender&quot;.  Just my $.02 worth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to learn a few bits of information from this post, however the one thing that bothers me about it is the phrase: &#8220;the ex-wife of a convicted pedophile&#8221; in the 3rd to last paragraph.  There is no such thing as a &#8220;convicted pedophile&#8221;.   It should have been worded &#8220;convicted sex-offender&#8221;.  Just my $.02 worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
