<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California loosens Jessica&#039;s Law rules on where sex offenders can live	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/california-loosens-jessicas-law-rules-on-where-sex-offenders-can-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/california-loosens-jessicas-law-rules-on-where-sex-offenders-can-live/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Karen		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/california-loosens-jessicas-law-rules-on-where-sex-offenders-can-live/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=2050#comment-1643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are right Jerry - all the RSO laws are appalling but the way CP cases are handled is completely unfair - in other words for example as we know CP in FL is anyone under the age of 18.  In my county the living restrictions only apply to those whose victim was under the age of 16.  So when you have a CP possessor  where is the proof that the victims were under 16?  In my sons case no forensics were ever done on the photos and the photos that were listed in the search warrant were never found on his computer - so where is the proof?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Jerry &#8211; all the RSO laws are appalling but the way CP cases are handled is completely unfair &#8211; in other words for example as we know CP in FL is anyone under the age of 18.  In my county the living restrictions only apply to those whose victim was under the age of 16.  So when you have a CP possessor  where is the proof that the victims were under 16?  In my sons case no forensics were ever done on the photos and the photos that were listed in the search warrant were never found on his computer &#8211; so where is the proof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerry		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/california-loosens-jessicas-law-rules-on-where-sex-offenders-can-live/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=2050#comment-1642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe FAC should forward this to Florida&#039;s legislators. This emphasizes the utter failure of residency restrictions. Of course, in Florida it wouldn&#039;t help those convicted of simply viewing or possessing child pornography though, because the way F.S. 827.071(5) is written, each child in each picture or video is considered a victim of the viewer/possessor even though the viewer/possessor had no physical contact with that child.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe FAC should forward this to Florida&#8217;s legislators. This emphasizes the utter failure of residency restrictions. Of course, in Florida it wouldn&#8217;t help those convicted of simply viewing or possessing child pornography though, because the way F.S. 827.071(5) is written, each child in each picture or video is considered a victim of the viewer/possessor even though the viewer/possessor had no physical contact with that child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
