Right before the 13 minute mark they talk about this case. https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm257-dont-want-a-pfr-nearby-in-california-open-a-home-school/

This is great info, Education, and indicates other areas where this ordinance may be susceptible to challenge.

If it’s true that ‘’this ordinance has already passed, there is no other hearing’ (and I’m taking the Chairman at his word), then we better stop fruitlessly hassling the commissioners, take down our Call to Action, and explore the next step as suggested by Tearfuleagle.

Interested whether FJI views this ordinance as vulnerable and is interested.

According to an FAC member who lives in Hernando Co, the chairman of the commissioners said that a second reading is not necessary — only necessary for land and zoning ordinances.

That is not what FL statute says.

Or was that the second reading and the chairman was not aware that is was?

The calls and emails are necessary to prove that there was opposition if a lawsuit is brought about — a lawsuit that many are wanting to see happen.

But, yes, the commissioners are saying that the ordinance is now law and awaiting for approval from the state.

The ordinance has already passed? Is this true?

Thank you, Peter P.

Just a followup, I emailed each of the county commissioners and received a response from 2. One just said thanks for the email, the other sent this:

Posting of “No Candy Here” signs does not identify the reason, does not require a statute to be posted on the sign, and should already be standard protocol for any required to avoid contact with children.

This ordinance has already passed, there is no other hearing.

Respectfully,
John Allocco
Chairman
Hernando Board of County Commissioners

I don’t know if I’ll hear from the other 3.

Both Brevard & Seminole years ago passed (arguably) worse ordinances that thus far have survived our challenges.

Though certain provisions may be susceptible to challenge, as Duval example shows.