Many thanks for all of your efforts. I emailed FAC, NARSOL, ACSOL and advised them that they should likely bring this further to their members’ Attention so more people could at least email these representatives.

I’ve read the bill. It does not apply to those who live in a state in the United States who no longer has to register, who has no intention of moving oversees. This mainly affects those living internationally, who may one day move back to the United States, because they would be require to register in the state they go to, especially if they were already required to. In the “governments eyes”, people are evading registration by moving internationally, which we know is not the case.

My pleasure 🙏

Thanks for posting this. I used your language as a baseline and added on my personal experience of being turned away when vacationing.

Keep note that 5 emails bounced back and didn’t work. The rest seem to have gone through OK.

Here is what I wrote:

(didn’t work) Bill.keating@mail.house.gov
(didn’t work)
Dina.titus@mail.house.gov
(didn’t work)
Ted.Lieu@mail.house.gov
(didn’t work)
Susan.wild@mail.house.gov
(didn’t work)
Dean.phillips@mail.house.gov

Gregory.meeks@mail.house.gov
brad.sherman@mail.house.gov
Gerald.Connelly@mail.house.gov
Theodore.Deutch@mail.house.gov
Karen.bass@mail.house.gov
david.cicilline@mail.house.gov
Amy.bera@mail.house.gov
Joaquin.Castro@mail.house.gov
Susan.wild@mail.house.gov
Dean.phillips@mail.house.gov
Ilhan.omar@mail.house.gov
Colin.allred@mail.house.gov
Andy.levin@mail.house.gov
Abigail.Spanberger@mail.house.gov
Christy.Houlihan@mail.house.gov
Andy.kim@mail.house.gov
Sarah.jacobs@mail.house.gov
Kathy.Manning@mail.house.gov
Jim.costa@mail.house.gov
Juan.vargas@mail.house.gov
Vicente.Gonzalez@mail.house.gov
Brad.Schneider@mail.house.gov
Chris.smith@mail.house.gov
Steve.chabot@mail.house.gov
Joe.wilson@mail.house.gov
Scott.perry@mail.house.gov
Adam.Kinzinger@mail.house.gov
Ann.Wagner@mail.house.gov
Brian.mast@mail.house.gov
Brian.Fitzpatrick@mail.house.gov
Ken.buck@mail.house.gov
Tim.Burchett@mail.house.gov
Mark.green@mail.house.gov
Andy.barr@mail.house.gov
Greg.Steube@mail.house.gov
Dan.Meuser@mail.house.gov
Claudia.Tenney@mail.house.gov
August.Pfluger@mail.house.gov
Peter.Meijer@mail.house.gov
Nicole.Malliotakis@mail.house.gov
Ronny.Jackson@mail.house.gov
Young.Kim@mail.house.gov
Maria.Salazar@mail.house.gov

Subject:
STRONGLY OPPOSE IML (International Megans Law) EXTENSION Section 201 HR 6552

Body:
Good Day Representative,

This notice is to inform you that as a representative of multiple groups fighting for Constitutional Laws, and on behalf of roughly 1 Millions US citizens that have been forcibly place, without a judge’s discretion, on the Sex Offender Registry, we STRONGLY oppose a further extension of International Megans Law, referred to as IML.

This law was created based on zero research or empirical evidence.

What IML does is prevent law-abiding US citizens that have paid their dues to society from traveling freely. People who abide by IML are stopped and turned away at the destination country, without any reason, other than IML. These people who are on vacation or visiting their spouses or family members overseas have their Basic Human Rights violated regularly due to IML.

Before extending IML, and wasting further taxpayer dollars, we the Taxpayers demand an in-depth study showing irrefutable proof that such a law is absolutely necessary.

This just comes down to common sense. If you’re going to vote to destroy a stigmatized class of citizens’ rights to travel, then at least show Emperical Proof that it is absolutely necessary.

This is how Laws should always be formed: based on science and numbers, not ‘feel good ideas’ that actually cause more harm than good.

Best Regards,

I wish I could pay all of them a personal visit as a representative of the registrant community and myself. Love to see them collapse when they just had a conversation with a registrant.