“The following evidence creates a rebuttable presumption of detriment to the child:
A parent has been convicted of or had adjudication withheld for an offense enumerated in s. 943.0435(1)(h)1.a.

A parent who has been convicted of or had adjudication withheld for an offense enumerated in s. 943.0435(1)(h)1.a. creates a presumption against time-sharing for the parent
The parent may rebut the presumption upon a specific finding in writing by the court that the parent poses no significant risk of harm to the child and that time-sharing is in the best interest of the child. If the presumption is rebutted, the court shall consider all time-sharing factors”

https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=PCS%20for%20HB%20141.DOCX&DocumentType=Proposed%20Committee%20Bills%20(PCBs)&Session=2021&CommitteeId=3095

The only thing I know is that MATH DOES NOT LIE!!! And the Legislators are the liars!

Does anyone know what happened to this ex post facto case?:

https://narsol.org/2017/07/alabama-case-now-before-11th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/

Maestro

When my incident occurred, when I was arrested, and when I was sentenced, no registry existed. A month before I was released they imposed it and I had to register for life.

Seems someone sentenced to a sex offence in 1971 for life, and say they finally get released in 2021 for some reason, I suppose they would have to register as well because they were still on sanctions. If not, then I should not have to either.

RM,
During my sentencing hearing (the day I was sent to prison), the judge pulled my attorney and the DA to a sidebar which I was close enough to the bench to hear. The judge said to the DA “Are we requiring sex offender registration for this?”
The DA said “Yes.” And the judge handed down my sentence and sentenced me to 10 yrs registration as a sex offender which ran along side my 10 yrs of probation. They both came to an end at the same time.

6th Circuit

14 is the cut off for R&J

@ RM:

Respectfully disagree with “not part of sentencing”. The requirement to register is set out in the penal or criminal code of every state statute I have seen, generally worded as “a person convicted of xxxx shall register in accordance with xxxx.”

Further, if someone without a conviction attempted to register, he would most likely be turned away. I’ve asked a couple of friends to try that but they refused, more concerned (legitimately, I think) that the sheriff’s office would harass and try to create a crime to prosecute.

sunshine

That is weird, usually that is covered by the romeo and juliet clause. However, maybe that was not in effect when he was charged

Not saying it is right but, My Dad was 27 when he married my Mom when she was 15. They just had their 59th wedding anniversary.