To clarify, you are saying that someone has been required to register for adult pornography (only)?

The point is that it is very easy for law enforcement to be using such photos of grown women and putting those online for men to click on or have on their phones, and then they falsely accuse those men of possessing CP, when in reality, it is not an actual child. It’s a fully grown adult woman pretending to be a kid, just like they do in the online sting operations where decoys pretend to be a minor who is seeking a sexual hookup with an adult man. It had nothing to do with real children and there are no real children involved. It’s adults pretending to be minors, and they do this for their own sexual purposes. They want to be treated like they are kids in adult sexual scenarios.

That’s what it’s really about. It’s about their own sexual preferences, and then they drag men into those sexual scenarios to then falsely accuse them of viewing or having CP or of trying to solicit a minor online for s3x. In CP cases, it’s not like they’re going to show the pictures to the judges or the juries and ask them to determine if that is a real child or an adult playing the role of a minor in a sexual scenario. I think it should be a requirement for police to identify a real child victim in those photos.

We are living in a very scary world for men right now because it’s very easy for law enforcement to create a fake CP case or an online solicitation of a minor case against just about any man.

Good on the Great White North in keeping with the idea of judicial restraint in allowing the system to work as people believe it should. Judge Persky, et al thank you too even though it is too late for their judicial careers.