Pedophilia refers to those with a primary attraction to prepubescent children. Gaetz and others are often referred to as pedophiles even when they don’t qualify for the label. The term has a very specific definition in the clinical context, but in common usage has devolved to the status of a “dog whistle.”

I don’t like it when such terms are misused, as they often are with sex offenders. It causes confusion and contributes to the public perception that all sex offenders are the same. Gaetz is more properly termed an ephebophile (attracted to mid to late teens), but that term has less pizzazz and wouldn’t send the dogs running. Notably, the DSM-5 doesn’t list this as a pathology.

These types do not speak ill of each other out of fear of one deciding to spill the beans on the whole group. They get the heat off of themselves by trying to transfer it to someone else. This is what happens when we have a leadership that puts aside the founding principles of this nation and does all it can to gain power and influence…and some $$$ on the side.

This is ONLY about branding – this is not a political commentary AT ALL. If it got derailed we are sorry.

The shunning is particularly harmful because if even our own families shun us, how can we expect anyone else to care if we are harmed, shunned or even murdered.

I feel like this article was just a discussion on the effects of “branding” not endorsing Trumps or DeSantis’ views. Just about how dangerous branding people can be !

‘Pedophile’ may be an unscientific term for Gaetz but also a reminder to voters that you wouldn’t want him getting to know your 17-year-old daughter much less continuing to serve in Congress.

So is Lauren Book. So is Brevard County Commissioner John Tobia.

Neither have spoken out about Matt Gaetz, either.

If you are credibly suspected of a sex crime against a minor, your political opponent will ALWAYS use it against you, and you should NOT expect the endorsement of a statewide elected official.

THIS WILL NOT CHANGE. We could prevail in all our court challenges, find sympathetic representatives in the legislature, soften public opinion, and even bring the registry down, but what the article is describing, will not change. And I don’t think any FAC members wish to see Matt Gaetz’s case swept under the rug. He has not been held to account for his (suspected) actions! Don’t we want him to? Having to face the consequences in the political arena is at least a start, isn’t it?

I appreciate the increasing volume of original FAC content on this site lately. But this posting doesn’t give the impression of having been thought through. After all, the linked article has little to no connection with the sex offender registry. Except perhaps in our imaginations. Are we reading something into the article that’s not there? (How many times does ‘sex offender’ even appear in the article?).

Perhaps the point of the posting was to criticize Lombardo’s unscientific use of the term ‘pedophile’. I get that Geatz’s alleged victim does not fit the scientific definition. But so what? His constituents know what Gaetz is under investigation for, and it’s Lombardo’s job to remind them.

PS FAC you got me to say ‘I agree with DeSantis and Trump’ which doesn’t happen every day. But I agree with their non-endorsement. Were I in their shoes, I would be reluctant to endorse a criminal suspect.