Comments on: IMPORTANT UPDATE: Caution: Solicitations for “SORNA Compliance and Opinion Survey”

By: T&S

T&S — Mon, 23 Nov 2020 01:50:32 +0000

In reply to Detroit.

I could admit publicly to killing millions of people, but unless they found millions of bodies, than any charges would not hold water.

So just because you admit to something, doesn’t mean it is real, nor does it mean anything.

I admitted to a snitch that I believe in aliens, I had sex with aliens, been aboard their ships, and even to have a half human and half alien hybrid child. I knew they would love this, and would quickly try to prove me insane to throw away the key in some mental institution… after I was sure they “made plans”, I told my wife over the jail phone… “You know my little alien (European) … I told them XXX…. and the dumb arses believed it, and didn’t expect that I was calling you, with a green card, an alien! So… you told them something, don’t fret. means, nothing in court.

By: Detroit

Detroit — Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:11:27 +0000

JEV is correct. An email is hearsay and inadmissible in court unless it falls within the narrow hearsay rules.
You can be prosecuted if you admit to filling out the survey and verify each and every answer. The survey without an admission is worthless in court.
The survey is most likely legitimate. I’m not recommending that anyone take because I really don’t know what it is or how the answers will be used.
If you filled out the survey, I wouldn’t lose any sleep over it. This most likely is a legitimate survey that the author didn’t put too much thought into how the answers could affect the respondents.

By: JEV

JEV — Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:02:31 +0000

In reply to Detroit.

Your scaring the crap out of us.. you know this survey legit ot not does not constitute specific true information of each case because verification of emails and the person attached to said email cannot be proven. Unless I signed the form my sister could have filled it out! Plus is states information is private.. University Name mentioned so case dismissed!
JEV – TRUE CONFESSIONS

By: JEV

JEV — Sat, 21 Nov 2020 05:55:15 +0000

In reply to JZ.

He needed a few basic journalism classes before mass submitting this fish wrap survey! Anybody want to talk about leaving a LEA and using information obtained within FDLE to make contact with registrants? Any major Legal issues? Smells like cop stuff..
JEV – TRUE CONFESSIONS

By: JEV

JEV — Sat, 21 Nov 2020 05:45:56 +0000

In reply to Detroit.

There is no way to know for fact I was the specific person filling out the survey! Wouldnt hold water in court. This survey smells of a cop sting probably FDLE to bust non complaint Florida RSOs.
The College won’t respond to my investigation, I wonder why? JEV – True Confessions

By: Detroit

Detroit — Sat, 21 Nov 2020 02:27:21 +0000

I don’t believe he was aware of Delgado v Swearingen or any other case. He became aware of the list as an analyst and most likely received it through a public record’s request. Most of these guys know little to nothing about FOIA. The judge in Delgado mentioned that no one has ever requested a list of registrant’s emails before and didn’t expect anyone to ever request a list in the future. This is why registrants are so shocked and doubly shocked by the incriminating questions.
So far, the most reliable research is overwhelmingly coming down on the side of registrants proving that the registry is unnecessary to further the state’s goals or interests. This research is essential in showing that the registry is unconstitutional. Read all of the research in the plaintiff’s briefs in the various cases in Michigan and you will understand the importance of this research and how we are winning with it. I encourage all registrants to participate in this research if they can, especially if that research is encouraged by NARSOL, FAC, ACSOL, Oncefallen or another reliable source.
The only reason I am recommending that registrants not take this survey is because it asks incriminating questions that can be used against registrants in court and I have yet to verify the veracity of this survey. If it didn’t ask incriminating questions I would be advising otherwise. If i don,t get this verification, I will be sending this college a certified letter seeking verification. Also, we need to have some type of guarantee that registrant’s responses are anonymous or their responses won’t be turned over to law enforcement in such a manner that individual registrants can’t be tied to specific responses.
My belief is that this is a legitimate survey done without the consequences of it’s answers taken into consideration. College professors are nerds, not legal scholars. Until our concerns are addressed, I recommend that no one take this survey.

By: David Roller

David Roller — Fri, 20 Nov 2020 21:42:09 +0000

In reply to Detroit. "It appears that this college is substantially an online college so Duszka may be operating from Florida." Exactly my thought. Furthermore, why was he only with the FDLE for a few months?

By: David B Roller

David B Roller — Fri, 20 Nov 2020 21:36:26 +0000

In reply to Detroit.

“It appears that this college professor put out the survey not realizing the legal implications to registrants and was previously associated with FDLE for perhaps 9 months.”

He worked for the FDLE as an investigator, was possibly aware of Does v. Swearingen, and did not realize the legal implications of his survey? The guy has no formal legal training or law enforcement training??? Give me a break!

By: David Roller

David Roller — Fri, 20 Nov 2020 21:31:00 +0000

Could this possibly have some connection to Does v. Swearingen???

By: RM

RM — Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:35:22 +0000

I received (and immediately deleted) these emails to all of my registered email addresses — about 10 in total — many of which I never use at all but can’t get rid of because they are linked to former universities I attended and are how you get transcripts and so forth. The only way someone could have known that they were connected to me was if they had direct access to my FDLE registration information.