The term sex offender is present tense. A play on the mind by the use and misuse of word or terminology.

The current AI algorithm says this for the term “ex-offender”.

An “ex-offender” refers to an individual who has committed a crime, been convicted, and is no longer serving a sentence or under supervision. The term is used to acknowledge the past criminal activity while respecting the individual’s ability to move forward and rebuild their life.
Here’s a more detailed explanation:
Legal Definition:
“Ex-offender” can be defined by law, often referring to those who have been sentenced to probation or released from a correctional institution.
Post-Incarceration:
It typically applies to individuals who have completed their prison sentence and are no longer under the supervision of the criminal justice system.
Rehabilitation and Reintegration:
The term recognizes the process of rehabilitation and reintegration back into society after a criminal conviction.
Avoiding Stigma:
While “ex-offender” can be a neutral term, some prefer the term “former” or “formerly incarcerated” to avoid the stigma associated with past criminal activity.

Ex is a widely useful to everything and everyone in life and law.

I’m an EX. How many more out there are examples of EX as well?

Have a good day.

The problem with promoting a tiered registry is:

1. You’re advocating FR a registry.
2. You’re going to have to decide who should be thrown under the bus to get a precious few folks off the registry.

I’d never advocat for ANY registry and I’d only sayacknowledge that a three-tiereds registry is an improvement over FloriDUH’s current scheme, though abolishment of the registry is still far superior to a tier system.

I’d onlynever settle for anything short of abolirion very, very reluctantly, and make it clear this does NOT go far enough.

Well, lets see what happens. The only one left on the Supreme Court is Justice Thomas who had Justice Souters rose covered glasses to not see it is a punishment in 2003 with Smith v. Doe. With this hidden evidence of information I have uncovered in my case, it could have or more like would have changed the outcome of their ruling back then showing it’s a punishment Justice Souter tried to hide. We have this firepower today that could very well overturn it all and they know it. I just want to use it wisely for all people. I’m sure some in LE here know that it’s about to hit the fan. Just going into hell without representation or support is not the way I had expected, but I got the old man behind me. Facts don’t lie but they sure did to try an cover it up. It will be an interesting week, Stay tuned, I will keep FAC and NARSOL informed. But damn, they are gonna do it again to me in the media all over the world because they will fear me. I’m not doing this for me, I’m doing this for you. I always said, God sends me to clean up his dirty work. Why do they have to lie to punish people they hate?

Correct…Federal Codified Numerical Statutes Exist

Can’t Just change it…only thing that can be done is if the Funding goes away
-too many peoples hands are in the Cookie jar!

When I arrived they immediately assigned me to Tier One

After 10 years violation free you can get removed…I have petitioned but the Jurisdiction never created an evaluation committee per numerical codified statutory language (it has been 2 years with no response; I won’t pay $5K to an attorney for this nonsense…..I have two years left) Once again, Jurisprudence is based on the Size of Your Wallet

The Bigger your wallet the faster you can change things; to a point!