https://www.google.com/amp/s/denver.cbslocal.com/2021/06/04/transform-sex-offender-management-pulled-colorado-bill-claims-hurt-public-safety/%3famp

Even when people take a plea deal such as I did that was a compromise and yes I wanted to go to court and the lawyer I had knew it and so did the arresting officer. The officer calls me in that night before the trial and makes me a plea deal says everything will be ok if I plead guilty… gives me a bit of a wink and says trust me. While some may say this bill is good the registry is a bit of a dicey way to seek justice.

As he was leading me to the courtroom that day. I ask him if he was a christian and yes a christian follows christian principals… one could say, is this registry shakey ground for the many involved or caught up or do we as many of you all say need a registry of this type of deception, or who is leading who.

After the whole ordeal was over we had a talk and yes he admited in certain words that this is a game but its a tragic game to many. Even during the web text they wanted me to come down to just talk dirty to them. I have to admit I did talk a bit dirty. Second night was different but the same voice, and they even blocked me out of the chatter I was texting too.

Sure the authorities ask me for pictures and other items to make a case. Even going down their a lady calls me on the cell phone and ask why are you taking so long in anticipation and right their is were I asked to back out.

I accidently bumped into that lady and she said if it was brought to court she would deny about it or not tell the truth about it. And yes that encounter happened that second night and I was even on an adult website during the whole ordeal. So compromising is no good in any court of justice. Christian understanding can go a long ways and in many ways the registry should be banned by computer methods.

The problem with a “risk based approach” is that everyone will be considered a heightened risk by default. Sheer numbers will prevent any meaningful assessment and in the end, nothing will change. Tiering was supposed to be effective too, wasn’t it? Some states have been doing it for years, and it hasn’t made that much difference.

Colorado

We don’t need a “risk based registry.” We need no registry. Find one single crime outside of registry violations that the registry played any role in investigating. If you can, find one single thing that was on the registry that wasn’t already available though NCIC or the state counterparts that feed it.

After that, explain how the registry hindered the few and far between sexual recidivists.

Further, to be a reasonably accurate “risk-based” registry, it would have to include every single person that has never been arrested for a sex crime because 95+ percent of new sex crimes are committed by current non-registrants.

I remember an old CSI episode where a family attempted to cover the death of the youngest daughter by pinning it on someone they randomly picked out of the registry. I can’t help but wonder how many times that has actually happened.

I just moved to Indiana and have found all my interactions to be pleasant. I can vote here. Take my kid to a park. I guess it’s up to the individual to determine. I’m not saying I’ll live here forever, but so far it’s not bad

As for who should be on the Florida Board Committee, if it should ever come to this?? (1) Three (3) Blacks(3) Whites(3) Others. (2)Three(3) Faith-Based,(3)Doctor’s and (3) ex-felon that is no longer on the sex offenders registry.