The first PO I had tried the same, and I had to install the stupid tracker app. Told her first, the tracker wasn’t going to happen – it wasn’t in my terms and she couldn’t add it “just because.” Second, even if I was willing to install her monitoring app – which I wasn’t – it wasn’t compatible with Chrome, which runs my phone and laptop. She then claimed I wasn’t allowed to use either and would lock me up if she caught me.

I then took my phone out and sent a text to my daughter to meet me at the county jail that night if she didn’t hear otherwise within an hour. After that I put my hands out in front of me for the cuffs and said, “Let’s go. I want to hear you explain to the judge how you can add to my terms and how the monitor app is so critical when you can already search my devices whenever you want.”

After that, she kept telling me to calm down (even though I hadn’t moved or raised my voice) and that she’d call the court to “clarify.” “Clarify what? The disposition and terms are right there in front of you.” “Uh, uh, uh, it might be outdated.” “No problem, we’ll call the judge now. We’ll use my phone and put it on speaker.” “We don’t have time for that. I’ll be right back.” She told another PO to watch me sitting in her office and went somewhere, leaving me openly chuckling and the other PO struggling not to.

It just occurred to me that the picture of him as a baby swimming after a dollar on a fishhook was rather prophetic.

There are a lot of people who are now mid-life age who receive monetary awards from our federal courts because their child age nude images are still shared on the web. The so called “Vicky series ” is an example.

A few months ago, my PO told me I had to install software on my computer that monitored my computer. I use my computer for work so I told them no and they backed off. was not going to do it anyway. It was some third party software company. They could remote into my computer and place stuff there and then say they found it. They have a vested interest in doing that. I told my PO that software was no different than then sending there neighbor to my house to search. That was not going to happen, anyone else have that problem.

The funny thing is, this guy thinks anyone cares or even recognizes him as the baby on that album cover. Someone should break his poor little heart and clue him in; No. One. Cares.

I just had a flashback of the old “sex offender treatment” horror story where the provider would force groups to write down every single wrong thing they’ve ever done in a journal and then turn the journals over to LE to have more charges pressed. Anyone that refused was kicked out and returned to prison.

This is the exact no-win situation that LE likes to pursue.

Shouldn’t the author of the story be arrested for distributing CP for including a picture of the album cover?

This suit is nothing more than a guy trying to get royalties from the album. He lost the first time around because the statute of limitations had passed. and he’s bringing it again because of the re-release. Nothing wrong with that, but at least be honest about it.

If he was :”harmed” (which I seriously doubt), then why isn’t he suing his parents as well? They would have had to agree to the taking of the picture. In fact, is he seeking to have them arrested for child sex trafficking? Or the rest of the defendants? Why not? He was “harmed” and there’s no statute of limitations on that any more, correct?

https://www.aol.com/news/court-revives-nirvana-child-pornography-202047045.html