<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CT: Lawmakers debate revamping sex offender registry	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:32:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Riff Raff		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riff Raff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-carolina-bill-would-add-convicted-animal-abusers-to-an-online-registry-much-like-sex-offenders/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-carolina-bill-would-add-convicted-animal-abusers-to-an-online-registry-much-like-sex-offenders/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-carolina-bill-would-add-convicted-animal-abusers-to-an-online-registry-much-like-sex-offenders/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 16:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22527&quot;&gt;Florida Action Committee&lt;/a&gt;.

I sent a very slightly modified version to Gov. DeSantis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22527">Florida Action Committee</a>.</p>
<p>I sent a very slightly modified version to Gov. DeSantis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roxwayne		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roxwayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22527&quot;&gt;Florida Action Committee&lt;/a&gt;.

Amen o well said for sure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22527">Florida Action Committee</a>.</p>
<p>Amen o well said for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MJ		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If it wasn&#039;t so damn cold there, I&#039;d actually consider moving there lol.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it wasn&#8217;t so damn cold there, I&#8217;d actually consider moving there lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Florida Action Committee		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florida Action Committee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22526&quot;&gt;Dustin&lt;/a&gt;.

Dustin - this is very well written. Members reading this should be sharing it with their legislators.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22526">Dustin</a>.</p>
<p>Dustin &#8211; this is very well written. Members reading this should be sharing it with their legislators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dustin		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22526</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The original stated purposes of the registry was to prevent recidivism and notify the public of potential threats to them. Regarding recidivism, it&#039;s had no effect at all; the rate is pretty much unchanged from the pre-registry days (or increased, as the overwhelming majority of registrant arrests are for status offenses based on the registry itself). Regarding potential threats, statistically registrants as a whole are not among them - 97% of sex crime is committed by those not registered or without prior arrests.

Later came the &quot;good tool for law enforcement&quot; claim, also false. There&#039;s nothing on the registry (public or LE only) that isn&#039;t available through NCIC and the state counterparts that feed it and can be gained through a simple database query within a few moments. The registry has yet to play even the smallest role in the investigation of a crime or identification of a suspect. Even in the (very few and far between) cases where registrants do commit another sex offense, he&#039;s either identified on the spot or his status as a registrant isn&#039;t known until after arrest. Thus, the only thing the registry provides LE is bigger federal and state grants to maintain it, funds that are almost always spent somewhere else.

If &quot;common sense&quot; were the driving force behind this, they would be looking into abolishing the registry, not merely &quot;changing&quot; it. Numerous &quot;changes&quot; have been implemented over the years, each claiming (falsely) that it would make the registry better, more efficient, and result in safer communities. None have done so, and there&#039;s no reason I can see that would make these proposed changes any different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original stated purposes of the registry was to prevent recidivism and notify the public of potential threats to them. Regarding recidivism, it&#8217;s had no effect at all; the rate is pretty much unchanged from the pre-registry days (or increased, as the overwhelming majority of registrant arrests are for status offenses based on the registry itself). Regarding potential threats, statistically registrants as a whole are not among them &#8211; 97% of sex crime is committed by those not registered or without prior arrests.</p>
<p>Later came the &#8220;good tool for law enforcement&#8221; claim, also false. There&#8217;s nothing on the registry (public or LE only) that isn&#8217;t available through NCIC and the state counterparts that feed it and can be gained through a simple database query within a few moments. The registry has yet to play even the smallest role in the investigation of a crime or identification of a suspect. Even in the (very few and far between) cases where registrants do commit another sex offense, he&#8217;s either identified on the spot or his status as a registrant isn&#8217;t known until after arrest. Thus, the only thing the registry provides LE is bigger federal and state grants to maintain it, funds that are almost always spent somewhere else.</p>
<p>If &#8220;common sense&#8221; were the driving force behind this, they would be looking into abolishing the registry, not merely &#8220;changing&#8221; it. Numerous &#8220;changes&#8221; have been implemented over the years, each claiming (falsely) that it would make the registry better, more efficient, and result in safer communities. None have done so, and there&#8217;s no reason I can see that would make these proposed changes any different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Slater		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Slater]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This would be a major cornerstone coming down, if passed.

It should&#039;ve never been offense based. That&#039;s what the sentence/punishment is for(hmmm?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be a major cornerstone coming down, if passed.</p>
<p>It should&#8217;ve never been offense based. That&#8217;s what the sentence/punishment is for(hmmm?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22524</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22524</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well....DUH!

No one ever accused lawmakers of being the brightest bunch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.DUH!</p>
<p>No one ever accused lawmakers of being the brightest bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/ct-lawmakers-debate-revamping-sex-offender-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-22523</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=10491#comment-22523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Amazing, there is some &#039;common sense&#039;...which isn&#039;t all that common...out there.  Maintaining such a useless list is like saving used toilet paper for future use.  It&#039;s time our politicians focus on the real needs of the nation and state and quit funding a &#039;make work&#039; piece of paper that will end up in the trash dump of time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, there is some &#8216;common sense&#8217;&#8230;which isn&#8217;t all that common&#8230;out there.  Maintaining such a useless list is like saving used toilet paper for future use.  It&#8217;s time our politicians focus on the real needs of the nation and state and quit funding a &#8216;make work&#8217; piece of paper that will end up in the trash dump of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
