<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Decision in Internet Identifier Case	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 18:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Re: Internet Identifier Arrests (per FAC Weekly Update)		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-5/#comment-17508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Re: Internet Identifier Arrests (per FAC Weekly Update)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 18:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-5/#comment-17507&quot;&gt;Re: Internet Identifier Arrests (per FAC Weekly Update)&lt;/a&gt;.

This surprises me because it was my own sheriff’s registration staff who told me about the internet identifier challenge and what did not need to be registered.  (That was a few years ago, though).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-5/#comment-17507">Re: Internet Identifier Arrests (per FAC Weekly Update)</a>.</p>
<p>This surprises me because it was my own sheriff’s registration staff who told me about the internet identifier challenge and what did not need to be registered.  (That was a few years ago, though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Re: Internet Identifier Arrests (per FAC Weekly Update)		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-5/#comment-17507</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Re: Internet Identifier Arrests (per FAC Weekly Update)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 18:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FAC, which counties’ members are reporting most of these wrongful arrests? If you don’t mind my asking. That and other details may help us take action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAC, which counties’ members are reporting most of these wrongful arrests? If you don’t mind my asking. That and other details may help us take action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wannabe Zoomer		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-5/#comment-17506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wannabe Zoomer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Everyone’s Zooming now, it seems.

But how use Zoom while remaining compliant?

Do people normally have set usernames or screen names that they use with zoom? Should those be registered?  Or are these invisible/subject to change/not applicable?  All I see is a bunch of faces and backgrounds.

Does Zoom have a set URL that users access whenever they zoom?  Should that be registered?  Whenever I see an invitation to a zoom call, it seems like a different URL each time.

What if you are in a room with another Zoom user and you join a conference together? Do you have to register their username/ screen name?

Is Zoom even considered a social app?  Or at least, social enough that it normally requires registration?

Overall, do we know of any best practices for keeping up with people via Zoom while remaining compliant?

Zoom is becoming ubiquitous, and I feel left out because I am paralyzed by fear of an inadvertent registration failure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone’s Zooming now, it seems.</p>
<p>But how use Zoom while remaining compliant?</p>
<p>Do people normally have set usernames or screen names that they use with zoom? Should those be registered?  Or are these invisible/subject to change/not applicable?  All I see is a bunch of faces and backgrounds.</p>
<p>Does Zoom have a set URL that users access whenever they zoom?  Should that be registered?  Whenever I see an invitation to a zoom call, it seems like a different URL each time.</p>
<p>What if you are in a room with another Zoom user and you join a conference together? Do you have to register their username/ screen name?</p>
<p>Is Zoom even considered a social app?  Or at least, social enough that it normally requires registration?</p>
<p>Overall, do we know of any best practices for keeping up with people via Zoom while remaining compliant?</p>
<p>Zoom is becoming ubiquitous, and I feel left out because I am paralyzed by fear of an inadvertent registration failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Florida Action Committee		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florida Action Committee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17504&quot;&gt;Expostisafacto&lt;/a&gt;.

The government has not appealed. We won.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17504">Expostisafacto</a>.</p>
<p>The government has not appealed. We won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Expostisafacto		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Expostisafacto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 03:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17499&quot;&gt;Expostisafacto&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s been about 15 months now. Anything new on a possible appeal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17499">Expostisafacto</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been about 15 months now. Anything new on a possible appeal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Florida Action Committee		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florida Action Committee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17502&quot;&gt;Anonymouse&lt;/a&gt;.

Since the internet identifiers cannot be disclosed (pursuant to the order of the court in our II case), don&#039;t worry so much about &quot;extra&quot; ones.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17502">Anonymouse</a>.</p>
<p>Since the internet identifiers cannot be disclosed (pursuant to the order of the court in our II case), don&#8217;t worry so much about &#8220;extra&#8221; ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymouse		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17494&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello,
I have not seen a good answer on this yet and I would like to delete sites I no longer used or never used but simply created a account to see what the heck my friends are talking about. If you have a Tinder,Zoosk,Match or other type of account and have registered but deleted would you also delete on the FDLE?. I dont want to have issues with accounts I no longer use or the appearance that I do!

Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17494">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>Hello,<br />
I have not seen a good answer on this yet and I would like to delete sites I no longer used or never used but simply created a account to see what the heck my friends are talking about. If you have a Tinder,Zoosk,Match or other type of account and have registered but deleted would you also delete on the FDLE?. I dont want to have issues with accounts I no longer use or the appearance that I do!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WHL		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WHL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So after some time, what exactly is the requirement? I can&#039;t seem to find what we are supposed to be doing with Internet Identifiers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after some time, what exactly is the requirement? I can&#8217;t seem to find what we are supposed to be doing with Internet Identifiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SO		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17496&quot;&gt;Tearful Eagle&lt;/a&gt;.

this is exactly what we face...people don&#039;t understand what they have todo and thats exactly what keeps the system running!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17496">Tearful Eagle</a>.</p>
<p>this is exactly what we face&#8230;people don&#8217;t understand what they have todo and thats exactly what keeps the system running!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Expostisafacto		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/decision-in-internet-identifier-case/comment-page-4/#comment-17499</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Expostisafacto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9220#comment-17499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Back on September 21, 2018 FAC wrote:

&quot;We have had preliminary discussion with the attorneys, who need to digest the decision and decide among themselves what the best course of action would be, but an appeal is likely imminent.&quot;

It&#039;s been nearly nine months now. Maybe I just missed it (or forgot about it) but has there been any decision or progress on a decision about an appeal?

Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back on September 21, 2018 FAC wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;We have had preliminary discussion with the attorneys, who need to digest the decision and decide among themselves what the best course of action would be, but an appeal is likely imminent.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been nearly nine months now. Maybe I just missed it (or forgot about it) but has there been any decision or progress on a decision about an appeal?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
