Comments on: Disclosing Information on Children MIGHT Cross the Line

By: G

Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:35:21 +0000

Isn’t every tidbit of information PFR’s must provide a violation of the 1st amendment. If you have a right to say anything, you also have a right not to say anything. Especially if anything they say can and will be used against them.

By: Grown folks talking here

Grown folks talking here — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:16:55 +0000

Might cross the line? This stuff crosses so many lines Iv lost count. I don’t have anything constructive to say. But I do donate a little every month and have made some sporadic donations as I can afford it. So I will send funds towards this as much as I can till the day I die.
Iv never had anything in my life give me more grief, and disabilities than the “non punitive”
Registry.

By: DVC

DVC — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 19:08:10 +0000

This could go on and on.
You have to register your dog and the veteranarian you take it to, so the vet is informed about you.
You have to register your bank(s), so they can inform the bank about you.
You have to register your grocery stores and gas stations, so they can be informed about you.
You have to register your Church or any place of religion you attend, so they can be informed about you.
You have to regsiter every place you go, and failure to do so will result in a felony conviction.
This kind of nonsense law-making is what causes the public to falsely think that registrants are dangerous no-matter where they go, and yet the recidivism rate is less than 5%.
Why are legislators and councils continuing to produce laws like this in spite of the ‘frightening and high’ recidivism rate myth?
To fool the public into thinking they are making laws to protect children that, in fact, protect no one nor prevent crime.
It has gotten to the point of absurdity and beyond.

By: No end

No end — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 18:55:38 +0000

In reply to Beng. Beng, will this protect society? Go troll elsewhere.

By: Bwj

Bwj — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:49:35 +0000

Troll much? Look at it this way, a frequent defense of the additional registry laws and restrictions is the protection and safety of children. Forcing registrants to register their own child in no way provides for the safety and protection of a child.

By: mbgodofwar

mbgodofwar — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:41:12 +0000

This bill is dumb as mud.
The only ones keeping track of children are the schools (that the children go to) and the parents. A school should know who the parents are (obviously), and any reason there might be a “sex offender on campus” alert. If the registering agency (typically a sheriff’s office) has an option to know that the PFR has family, the PFR can disclose it, but that information should stay hidden from public eyes.

By: Tereto

Tereto — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:30:50 +0000

The case is far from over, but the Court’s position on this issue seems to indicate that it just might find that registering your children as part of the sex offender registration process crosses the line.

You think?

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:20:17 +0000

In reply to Beng. Children shouldn't be on a registry.

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:19:45 +0000

The sensible thing to do is to notify the school of YOUR presence, provided it doesn’t violate any terms of probation to do so, but registering your children should definitely be off limits.

By: FAC-3

FAC-3 — Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:18:40 +0000

In reply to Beng. We don't have to register children in Florida.