DVC, I absolutely agree. I would hope that all registered citizens would join the fight for freedom but it actually seems as if the majority simply let it happen…its easier. Nobody wants the heat from this. I would gladly have my name added to any and all claims submitted. I would also submit my own claim right this instance…if I knew how. But yes…I do agree 100%.

We have mothers, fathers, sister, brothers, wives, husbands and children who love us and rely on us. Please stop punishing not only us, but our families as well who also suffer these consequences. Thanks for listening and considering what these laws do is to break up households and tear apart families.

Charles.
I agree with nearly all of what you are saying.
However, NARSOl, FAC,and others have fought and won both individual and corporate cases-they are not just cheering sections, but are actively involved in lawsuits, and I would encorage you to at least look at the cases won and are currently challenged by NARSOL
Unfortunately, Rights can only be defended as to how the Courts and their Judges interptet them, and this is where the issue lies as well as being afraid of being ‘too soft’ on any crime, especially sex offenses, which have became a political ‘football’ so to speak.
Advocacy groups such as FAC, NARSOl, etc. are sensibly targeting such unconstituitonal infractions that affect the greater whole more so than individualistically.
It is only logical to destroy a structure at its foundation, because then the rest of it will collapse under its own weight.
Fires are extinquished by suffocating the source of the flames, otherwise, it will just keep spreading and creating more individual fires that keep spreading exponentially which is exactly what we see happening.
Spending time trying to fight each case individually would cost 10’s of thousands of dollars and consume more time and resources that could be utilized more efficiently to bring down the regristry as a whole, and I think you would agree with that.
Thanks for your reply

The toxicity of the label is designed and fully implemented to serve as a form of racism in it’s cause and effect. It’s fuel is hate by association. It’s the most insidious form of othering human’s have come up with.

If you actually read the bill, the main word used as inference is “individual.” It’s mentioned numerous times as a descriptor thoughout the bill. Which is paradoxically telling and spurious because we’re all looked upon, oppressed and punished AS A GROUP. It might as well be saing “those people” because that’s the intent.

They’ve probably been wanting to yank this from us for years, but waited for the perfect time to introduce this when everyone had their pitchforks and tourches out after those redacted files were released. It just proves the retaliatory and distracting nature of this bill’s intent. It’s not about public safety, it’s about distracting for political reasons, and a token gesture or consession for the angry sheep. This bill is 100% intellectually dishonest. It only serves as a “get even” measure.

This lawmaker is a lying and scheming opportunist!

He’s not a “fisically responsible conservate” that’s “protecting” or “saving” Medicaid. That argument for him will NOT work for him. Especially while BILLIONS are about to be spent on pop-up prisons for ICE to warehouse people nationwide FOR PROFIT.

Wow! This is well thought out and gernerally right to the point!
However, I would not say ‘Advocacy groups do not evaluate individual circumstances; they evaluate perceived threat attached to the label’ as a blanket statement, because FAC and other advocacy groups DO evaluate and even pursue individual cases, and when it comes down to it, many of us have our own ‘fingerprint’ conviction.
Therefore, it is much better to address the registry as a whole, than to try to piecemeal each individual court case.
If the entire registry is eliminated, then we wouldn’t need ‘anti-registry’ advocates at all for individuals or for class-action lawsuits to expose its uncontitutionality and uselessness.
This should appear in all the advocacy publications and also sent to the appropiate media channels, legislators,etc., unfortunately, many of whom will only delete it.
Some will read it and hopefully elaborate within themselves of the what is REALLY going on with these laws.
Also, there are those who will absolutely refuse the truth, not because it is true, but because it runs against the very
grain of what they have come to believe and therefore becomes an issue of pride and not of fact.
Thank you, Charles!

If they are not hiding it then they are admitting it which is usable in courts.

We are real people, with real famlies and real lives.

This bill states that our actual existence and longetivity doesn’t matter.

This bill needs to be rescinded ASAP. It’s an afront and an attack on human LIFE, intentionally punitive in scope and is a brazen attempt to circumvent the Constitution.

@Purely

I am starting to feel like we are turning into a leper colony in the eyes of the law makers. We have been shunned, denied, challenged, punished (Although they say none of it is punishment) and kicked when we are already down.
And these new requirements do not just affect us, but our families, loved ones and any friends or neighbors who actually tolerate us. When the deputies come to my house, neighbors are always asking “Why are the cops always at your house?” I have asked that question myself for decades.