Comments on: FAC Sues Seminole County, Florida over Sex Offender Exclusion Zones Ordinance

By: Karen

Karen — Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:21:12 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee. Oh I am so sorry for that....but I understand entirely.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:57:13 +0000

In reply to Karen. It was voluntarily dismissed. After the judge ruled our plaintiffs could not proceed anonymously, they dropped out for fear of retaliation. It's hard to sue the people who are enforcing the law against you.

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:34:11 +0000

Has anything happened with this? thanks

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:00:22 +0000

In reply to JJ. It is - these cases take a long time

By: JJ

JJ — Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:37:17 +0000

Is this still ongoing? When is an outcome to be expected?

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:34:28 +0000

In reply to Thomas Pekari. If you are in Seminole, you would be violating the ordinance.

By: Thomas Pekari

Thomas Pekari — Tue, 31 May 2016 23:03:30 +0000

In reply to violafury. I am a sex offender and a Disabled Veteran who travels a lot to fish and I wonder would I be arrested just going through a Federal State run road i.e I-95 or I-4?

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:05:05 +0000

In reply to Karen. No. The proximity ordinances and SORR (sex offender residency restrictions) are two different issues. SORRs control where you can live (effectively, where you can be between 10PM and 6AM and Proximity ordinances control were you can go 24/7.

By: Karen

Karen — Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:00:25 +0000

Just curious – when this case is won will it also demolish the living restrictions? I ask because in essence that are based on exclusionary zones .

By: Scott

Scott — Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:46:35 +0000

In reply to fac-admin. okies, will do.