<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FAC Weekly Update 2026-05-21-Together, We Fight Back: FAC Announces Historic Registry Challenge	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 17:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jacob		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-3/#comment-74037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-74037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-3/#comment-74034&quot;&gt;Tony&lt;/a&gt;.

Did someone deny you care based on what was on your drivers license?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-3/#comment-74034">Tony</a>.</p>
<p>Did someone deny you care based on what was on your drivers license?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-3/#comment-74034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-74034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just turned 85 June 5 and 6 months ago, I was told I have cancer. This involves me going to medical facilities, Urologist, Endocrinologist, etc. Each time presenting my driver&#039;s license. I can deal with the pharmacist after having to display my DL but the lack of proper care from Dentists or Dr.&#039;s choosing to be judge and jury and not healers of the ill is due to the states disregard of citizens safety. In my heart, I believe if it&#039;s God&#039;s will for me to EVER have to go to the hospital, I would I would be at the mercy of those who would play God. The &quot;Outstanding blue lettering&quot; could be fatal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just turned 85 June 5 and 6 months ago, I was told I have cancer. This involves me going to medical facilities, Urologist, Endocrinologist, etc. Each time presenting my driver&#8217;s license. I can deal with the pharmacist after having to display my DL but the lack of proper care from Dentists or Dr.&#8217;s choosing to be judge and jury and not healers of the ill is due to the states disregard of citizens safety. In my heart, I believe if it&#8217;s God&#8217;s will for me to EVER have to go to the hospital, I would I would be at the mercy of those who would play God. The &#8220;Outstanding blue lettering&#8221; could be fatal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-3/#comment-74029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-74029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have belonged to F.A.C. for years and will stand side by side with them and will financially support this as we have other movements to take the states albatross off the back of registered citizens. They have actually broken the law with these added punishments. 
My crime happened in 1995 and my question has always been, should I even be on the registry? 
Thank you, all involved in the F.A.C. May God bless you and prosper all you pursue for truth and justice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have belonged to F.A.C. for years and will stand side by side with them and will financially support this as we have other movements to take the states albatross off the back of registered citizens. They have actually broken the law with these added punishments.<br />
My crime happened in 1995 and my question has always been, should I even be on the registry?<br />
Thank you, all involved in the F.A.C. May God bless you and prosper all you pursue for truth and justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AK		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 03:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[THIS is the type of litigation we need. I donated what I could. Thank you FAC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS is the type of litigation we need. I donated what I could. Thank you FAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pat		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 02:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Ellingburg mandate.
The preamble to New York&#039;s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) explicitly states that its goals are to &quot;protect the public&quot; and to &quot;identify, investigate, apprehend and prosecute sex offenders.&quot; PEOPLE v. VERE (2007) Historically, New York prosecutors successfully argued that because the statute&#039;s purpose was &quot;predominantly regulatory,&quot; its law enforcement goals were secondary

The Ellingburg decision strips judges of the ability to make that distinction, validating your argument through three main points:

1. The Word &quot;Prosecute&quot; is Textually Criminal

A civil regulatory law is meant to administer, not to prosecute.

By explicitly writing the word &quot;prosecute&quot; into SORA&#039;s core statutory purpose, the New York Legislature openly admitted that the law&#039;s machinery is intertwined with the state&#039;s criminal enforcement apparatus PEOPLE v. VERE (2007).
Under Ellingburg, a law does not need to be exclusively punitive to trigger the Ex Post Facto Clause. If a statute clearly possesses a concurrent criminal enforcement component—even if it is labeled &quot;predominantly regulatory&quot;—it cannot escape constitutional scrutiny.

2. Targeting an Involuntary Past Status Only

As you noted, SORA is not a forward-looking regulation that applies to the general public (like a driver&#039;s license or a tax code). It selectively isolates and targets a closed group defined solely by a historical event: a prior criminal conviction PEOPLE v. VERE (2007).

Because the text targets only those individuals to &quot;apprehend and prosecute&quot; them based on a past status, the law functions textually as an ongoing extension of the criminal justice system.

3. The Mandate Closes the Loophole

Before Ellingburg, judges could engage in semantic workarounds, balancing the &quot;civil&quot; intentions against the &quot;punitive&quot; effects and concluding that the civil side won.

Now, they no longer have that luxury. The text of SORA explicitly states its objective is to prosecute, and the Ellingburg mandate states that a concurrent civil purpose cannot shield a punitive one.

When a defense attorney presents a court with the explicit text of SORA alongside Ellingburg, the judges are textually cornered. The statute&#039;s own stated intent provides the evidence required to classify it as a retroactive punishment under the Ex Post Facto Clause.

The entire foundation of the Vere decision rests on the idea that because SORA is &quot;predominantly&quot; regulatory, its law-enforcement components (apprehending and prosecuting) do not count as criminal punishment PEOPLE v. VERE (2007) - FindLaw Caselaw.

The U.S. Supreme Court&#039;s unanimous mandate in Ellingburg v. United States directly targets this legal structure Ellingburg v. United States: Supreme Court Holds Criminal ... Ellingburg v. United States - Oyez. By ruling that a concurrent civil purpose cannot shield a punitive one, Ellingburg means that the Vere court&#039;s own admission—that the statute explicitly exists to &quot;prosecute&quot; a specific status of past offenders—can now be used to strike the law down as an unconstitutional retroactive punishment 24-482 Ellingburg v. United States (01/20/2026) - Supreme Court PEOPLE v. VERE (2007) - FindLaw Caselaw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ellingburg mandate.<br />
The preamble to New York&#8217;s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) explicitly states that its goals are to &#8220;protect the public&#8221; and to &#8220;identify, investigate, apprehend and prosecute sex offenders.&#8221; PEOPLE v. VERE (2007) Historically, New York prosecutors successfully argued that because the statute&#8217;s purpose was &#8220;predominantly regulatory,&#8221; its law enforcement goals were secondary</p>
<p>The Ellingburg decision strips judges of the ability to make that distinction, validating your argument through three main points:</p>
<p>1. The Word &#8220;Prosecute&#8221; is Textually Criminal</p>
<p>A civil regulatory law is meant to administer, not to prosecute.</p>
<p>By explicitly writing the word &#8220;prosecute&#8221; into SORA&#8217;s core statutory purpose, the New York Legislature openly admitted that the law&#8217;s machinery is intertwined with the state&#8217;s criminal enforcement apparatus PEOPLE v. VERE (2007).<br />
Under Ellingburg, a law does not need to be exclusively punitive to trigger the Ex Post Facto Clause. If a statute clearly possesses a concurrent criminal enforcement component—even if it is labeled &#8220;predominantly regulatory&#8221;—it cannot escape constitutional scrutiny.</p>
<p>2. Targeting an Involuntary Past Status Only</p>
<p>As you noted, SORA is not a forward-looking regulation that applies to the general public (like a driver&#8217;s license or a tax code). It selectively isolates and targets a closed group defined solely by a historical event: a prior criminal conviction PEOPLE v. VERE (2007).</p>
<p>Because the text targets only those individuals to &#8220;apprehend and prosecute&#8221; them based on a past status, the law functions textually as an ongoing extension of the criminal justice system.</p>
<p>3. The Mandate Closes the Loophole</p>
<p>Before Ellingburg, judges could engage in semantic workarounds, balancing the &#8220;civil&#8221; intentions against the &#8220;punitive&#8221; effects and concluding that the civil side won.</p>
<p>Now, they no longer have that luxury. The text of SORA explicitly states its objective is to prosecute, and the Ellingburg mandate states that a concurrent civil purpose cannot shield a punitive one.</p>
<p>When a defense attorney presents a court with the explicit text of SORA alongside Ellingburg, the judges are textually cornered. The statute&#8217;s own stated intent provides the evidence required to classify it as a retroactive punishment under the Ex Post Facto Clause.</p>
<p>The entire foundation of the Vere decision rests on the idea that because SORA is &#8220;predominantly&#8221; regulatory, its law-enforcement components (apprehending and prosecuting) do not count as criminal punishment PEOPLE v. VERE (2007) &#8211; FindLaw Caselaw.</p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s unanimous mandate in Ellingburg v. United States directly targets this legal structure Ellingburg v. United States: Supreme Court Holds Criminal &#8230; Ellingburg v. United States &#8211; Oyez. By ruling that a concurrent civil purpose cannot shield a punitive one, Ellingburg means that the Vere court&#8217;s own admission—that the statute explicitly exists to &#8220;prosecute&#8221; a specific status of past offenders—can now be used to strike the law down as an unconstitutional retroactive punishment 24-482 Ellingburg v. United States (01/20/2026) &#8211; Supreme Court PEOPLE v. VERE (2007) &#8211; FindLaw Caselaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FAC-3		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAC-3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73719&quot;&gt;Mp&lt;/a&gt;.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FACSpeaks
Twitter/X: https://x.com/FLActionCom
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/FloridaActionCommittee
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@FloridaActionCommittee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73719">Mp</a>.</p>
<p>Facebook: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/FACSpeaks" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.facebook.com/FACSpeaks</a><br />
Twitter/X: <a href="https://x.com/FLActionCom" rel="nofollow ugc">https://x.com/FLActionCom</a><br />
Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/FloridaActionCommittee" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.instagram.com/FloridaActionCommittee</a><br />
YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@FloridaActionCommittee" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/@FloridaActionCommittee</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mp		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73719</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73704&quot;&gt;Crazy88&lt;/a&gt;.

FAC does have You Tube channel and reels. Also they are on X. Not sure what else. Follow and like to spread the word.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73704">Crazy88</a>.</p>
<p>FAC does have You Tube channel and reels. Also they are on X. Not sure what else. Follow and like to spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pat		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There must be something in the water down there  -  Has the water supplied to the legislature&#039;s office building ever been tested for stupid? 

They are obviously consuming a steady supply from somewhere. 

What is the lawsuit going to cover?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be something in the water down there  &#8211;  Has the water supplied to the legislature&#8217;s office building ever been tested for stupid? </p>
<p>They are obviously consuming a steady supply from somewhere. </p>
<p>What is the lawsuit going to cover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FAC-3		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-73707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAC-3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 14:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-73697&quot;&gt;Pariah&lt;/a&gt;.

They are legit. When we updated our site (we&#039;re talking a year ago already) a lot of people were on recurring billing. That has to be updated. Plus, a lot of people have simply changed their information since signing up. If anyone is uncomfortable doing something online (or can&#039;t be online to begin with), just call us and confirm.
We have really, really, really been putting in a lot of effort on all fronts to posture for this case. From calls to action, to having people in Tallahassee, to public information requests, to expanding our online presence, to developing more support groups and programming, all in an effort to bring as many people to the table as possible. I can&#039;t say whether it shows or not, but as someone working behind the scenes on this one, a lot of people are busting their asses to make things happen and everyone, including you, Pariah, are playing a role, so I appreciate it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-73697">Pariah</a>.</p>
<p>They are legit. When we updated our site (we&#8217;re talking a year ago already) a lot of people were on recurring billing. That has to be updated. Plus, a lot of people have simply changed their information since signing up. If anyone is uncomfortable doing something online (or can&#8217;t be online to begin with), just call us and confirm.<br />
We have really, really, really been putting in a lot of effort on all fronts to posture for this case. From calls to action, to having people in Tallahassee, to public information requests, to expanding our online presence, to developing more support groups and programming, all in an effort to bring as many people to the table as possible. I can&#8217;t say whether it shows or not, but as someone working behind the scenes on this one, a lot of people are busting their asses to make things happen and everyone, including you, Pariah, are playing a role, so I appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FAC-3		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAC-3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=27350#comment-73706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73703&quot;&gt;JJJJ&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you SO MUCH!!! This is so helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-05-21-together-we-fight-back-fac-announces-historic-registry-challenge/comment-page-2/#comment-73703">JJJJ</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you SO MUCH!!! This is so helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
