Appears from this that the state is appealing, not the registrant, but someone with Pacer can confirm.

If the state prevails, then that would allow Florida to make SORRs (and even presence restrictions) more expansive and vague than they are already.

And according to this https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/#:~:text=Decisions%20by%20all%20three%20district,Eleventh%20Circuit%20Court%20of%20Appeals. the next appeal stop is the 11th circuit which is us.

So this could affect us here in Florida so we need to keep tabs on this case.

Remember this man waited 7 years for this ruling he committed his offense before the registry existed I think he’s a really good plaintiff.

[Moderator’s note: The court writes, on Page 2 of the linked opinion, “this opinion does not consider the constitutionality of sex-offender residency restrictions generally, but only aspects of Alabama’s residency provision in its current form”].