Comments on: Florida's 5th DCA says no separate charges for same conduct.

By: Karen

Karen — Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:41:31 +0000

Speaking of CP charges something else that I have questioned often is that there are several FL laws that designate age. For example, I believe the living restriction only applies to those whose victim was 16 or younger (something like that) but what about CP charges? They apply all restrictions to people convicted of Cp and yet Cp is defined as any sexual picture of those under 18. So why are they required to validate the age (or at least approx.) ages of victims? Instead they just lump all all CP convictions together. It could make a huge difference in someone’s life if they did not have to worry about where they can live.

By: I can't wait to die

I can't wait to die — Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:58:09 +0000

if you accepted a plea deal i think this is a moot point unless you could go back to court and invalidate the plea deal due to this

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:58:44 +0000

Same thing immediately popped into my mind also

By: H

Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:46:27 +0000

In reply to JZ. I am wondering the same thing. Does anyone know?

By: JZ

JZ — Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:20:37 +0000

How will this affect CP cases? According to F.S. 827.071(5)(a) ”The possession, control, or intentional viewing of each such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, image, data, computer depiction, representation, or presentation is a separate offense.

If such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, data, computer depiction, or other presentation includes sexual conduct by more than one child, then each such child in each such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, data, computer depiction, or other presentation that is knowingly possessed, controlled, or intentionally viewed is a separate offense.”