Comments on: Fort Mitchell neighbors wanted a playground to displace a sex offenders

By: Media

Media — Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:10:36 +0000

In reply to Media.

Link to the Aurora article:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/aurora-beacon-news/ct-abn-wayside-cross-lawsuit-update-st-1103-20191031-ometjtigdfd5ljal25i553qiia-story.html

By: Media

Media — Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:09:54 +0000

Some registrants in Aurora have received some help, at least for now, from a federal judge over a residency restriction from a piece of property that they said was never meant to be a playground.

By: JZ

JZ — Fri, 18 Oct 2019 20:41:45 +0000

In reply to DS. Yes, but the requirement to move out of a residence that you lawfully occupied prior to a park being created is punitive, thus violates ex post facto. Read FAC's comment below.

By: Anne

Anne — Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:16:57 +0000

In reply to Dustin. Will you share with us how that can be done?

By: Anne

Anne — Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:13:52 +0000

In reply to CherokeeJack. Agreed!

By: Dustin

Dustin — Thu, 17 Oct 2019 19:06:45 +0000

In reply to Anne. I think this weekend I'm going to look into filing a formal grievance with the Kentucky Bar Association. Suggest others do the same.

By: DS

DS — Thu, 17 Oct 2019 18:18:14 +0000

In reply to JZ. This only applies to registrants that their crime was after July of 2006.

By: CherokeeJack

CherokeeJack — Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:02:15 +0000

In reply to Anne. Or the Salem witch trials. Many of them were found guilty of being a witch and hung in a public setting.

By: CherokeeJack

CherokeeJack — Thu, 17 Oct 2019 02:37:14 +0000

In reply to Kevin Hill. We have seen time and time again, many judges interpret the law how THEY want it to read, not the way it was intended to be. That is why we have courts of appeals. Unfortunately it is a catch 22. While on appeal would the person have to move and then come back if they win or be able to stay and only leave if they lose? I may not be alive to see it, however eventually all these laws are going to blow up in their faces when registered citizens just start giving up, but not in the way they would like them to. In a way where we all lose our minds and 100,000 of us chain ourselves to the front of the Supreme court building in Washington D.C and refuse to leave until our voices are heard. (ok I can dream anyway)

By: Anne

Anne — Thu, 17 Oct 2019 02:25:36 +0000

So disgusting that a government ‘attorney’, with city government approval, is using tax payer dollars to harrass and make homeless a citizen on a forced government list. At the least, the so called ‘upholder of the laws’ is guilty of attempting to divert public money to build his kids a park. At the worst, he and his boss are no different than the government officials and townspeople who donned swatiskas before driving public government registrants from their homes. Shame on Fort Mitchell, Campbell County and Kentucky, for looking the other way.