Comments on: Idaho “crimes against nature” lawsuit heads towards settlement

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:05:44 +0000

Yes but incredibly, until Lawrence v. Texas was decided in 2003, it was the position of the government, via the Supreme Court, that those things could be the state’s business if the state so decided.

Our jurisprudence unfortunately seems to be veering back in that direction if you’ve noticed. That’s why it’s so critical to be politically involved.

By: Disgusted in Michigan

Disgusted in Michigan — Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:57:16 +0000

How the hell does a guy get convicted of a sex crime for a consensual act with his wife? And if this occurred in the privacy of their bedroom, why should the government be sticking its nose in a married couple’s business? What a married couple , or even an unmarried couple does consensually in the privacy of their own home is no one’s business but their own.
What’s next? The government telling people what they can and cannot eat, or what times they can eat?
As long as what this guy and his wife were doing wasn’t being deliberately done in front of an open window for kids passing by to see, he should never have been charged.
I’m very curious to know what the “facts” of his case are.

By: Joseph Pratt

Joseph Pratt — Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:30:54 +0000

What a married couple does, what husband and wife consent to in the privacy of their bedroom is their private business. Plus even the Bible says that the marriage bed is undefiled. So what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their physical intimacy/in their romantic life is not a crime and should not be a crime.