Well said sir. Political Correctness has eroded the sacrosanct presumption of innocence the Constitution affords any accused. Commiecrat after Commiecrat “believes” Ford? She has told a story; not “her truth” supported by one shred of evidence. I wonder if any of the #MeToo minions would request an FBI investigation on themselves were they accused of a crime? Is it now up to any accused in the USSA to prove that they’re innocent? That certainly seems to be the way we’re going here.

Unfortunately, many, if not most people convicted of a sex offense (including myself) were convicted with no more evidence than that. I wish the media would point that out here when they mention unfairness.

Dr. Ford had a credible testimony but no credible evidence…not one witness…while 63 women backed the judge. Not sure of the location, the date, or time…how can the FBI investigate such a weak testimony? This whole evolution is enough to turn any sane person against sex. Our society is becoming one of “non-sequitur”…invalid argument in which the conclusion does not logically follow from the statements that come before it. For example: John is a male. Therefore, John is a rapist. If this continues men and women are going to no longer want to associate with each other out of fear.

Sorry Dustin. I missed your post. I did a google search a couple of weeks ago to look for info. Here is just one:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/09/brett-kavanaugh-track-record-675294
And here’s an article that talks about how he sometimes favors the defense:
http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/08/judge-kavanaughs-record-in-criminal-cases/
I looked at a ton of stuff,but as some have noted in those articles, his judicial leanings are hard to figure out, as many of his cases are very ordinary and non-controversial.

I feel that what the Senate is determining in this appointment more than anything else is how much hear say does it take without any evidence to convict as guilty someone and to totally determine there future. However they act will be further carried out in courts through the country.

Justice Thomas often joined in decisions that favored accused and/or convicted criminals, so it’s really difficult to guess what any particular Justice will do once seated. Sentiment is often that liberals are softer on crime than conservatives, but that doesn’t always translate to members of the Supreme Court. My hope in regards to this sex offender registry mess is that ALL of the Justices will finally take a stand against politically popular propaganda about the danger of sex offenders re-offending, and look at the real statistics that show the registry to be an ineffective tool that merely persecutes us and our families long after we have paid our debt to society.

I fully agree.