<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In Person Challenge FILED!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 18:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Florida Action Committee		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florida Action Committee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20012&quot;&gt;Muriel&lt;/a&gt;.

While that&#039;s FDLE&#039;s reply - there is nothing in the statute that provides for Emergencies or office closures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20012">Muriel</a>.</p>
<p>While that&#8217;s FDLE&#8217;s reply &#8211; there is nothing in the statute that provides for Emergencies or office closures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Muriel		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20012</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 17:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20011&quot;&gt;Jm&lt;/a&gt;.

Shortly after this statute when into effect, the FAC wrote the FLDE for guidance. The reply in writing is on this website, but basically IF you cannot get in touch with either the Sherriff nor the DMV, a call to the FLDE will suffice until you can become compliant. Just make sure that you get the date, time and name of FDLE person. The reply mentioned they are open 24/7/365 so that call along with a copy of the letter should suffice in case you are questioned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20011">Jm</a>.</p>
<p>Shortly after this statute when into effect, the FAC wrote the FLDE for guidance. The reply in writing is on this website, but basically IF you cannot get in touch with either the Sherriff nor the DMV, a call to the FLDE will suffice until you can become compliant. Just make sure that you get the date, time and name of FDLE person. The reply mentioned they are open 24/7/365 so that call along with a copy of the letter should suffice in case you are questioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jm		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20011</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 14:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20010&quot;&gt;Muriel&lt;/a&gt;.

Im not on papers so dont have a po and was recently told a phone call not enough as i dont have a case po or anything. Their response was see what happens. Am concerned if i go afterward to say i was admitted for 4 days im opening myself  to self incrimination. Is there any wording in the statute that would protect me?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20010">Muriel</a>.</p>
<p>Im not on papers so dont have a po and was recently told a phone call not enough as i dont have a case po or anything. Their response was see what happens. Am concerned if i go afterward to say i was admitted for 4 days im opening myself  to self incrimination. Is there any wording in the statute that would protect me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Muriel		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20010</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20009&quot;&gt;Jm&lt;/a&gt;.

Happened to us. Husband admitted, through Emergency Room, to hospital for C-diff. Was there for third day. This is the one time that being &#039;on papers&#039; is OK.
 PO came to check and when asked that question said she would have to check with Supervisor.

Answer was &#039;a hospital is NOT a residence, no need to report&#039;.
Got it in writing, just in case!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20009">Jm</a>.</p>
<p>Happened to us. Husband admitted, through Emergency Room, to hospital for C-diff. Was there for third day. This is the one time that being &#8216;on papers&#8217; is OK.<br />
 PO came to check and when asked that question said she would have to check with Supervisor.</p>
<p>Answer was &#8216;a hospital is NOT a residence, no need to report&#8217;.<br />
Got it in writing, just in case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jm		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20009</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2018 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will the fact that if i end up in a hospital for days i can be found in violation of this dumb rule be brought up in this?  What if i need emergency travel friday evening and have no way of contacting anyone to do anything? Jail! 
And each circumstance i go to report i literally get different answers so this is subject to horrible interpretation and i am at the whim of their ignorance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the fact that if i end up in a hospital for days i can be found in violation of this dumb rule be brought up in this?  What if i need emergency travel friday evening and have no way of contacting anyone to do anything? Jail!<br />
And each circumstance i go to report i literally get different answers so this is subject to horrible interpretation and i am at the whim of their ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sc		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20008</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20004&quot;&gt;Sc&lt;/a&gt;.

Still, you have 3 weeks to respond to an address verification.

Don&#039;t let them scare you into thinking otherwise.
Live your life man!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20004">Sc</a>.</p>
<p>Still, you have 3 weeks to respond to an address verification.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let them scare you into thinking otherwise.<br />
Live your life man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Big J		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20007</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a link that shows the reality of what Ron Book as done in Miami-Dade county.

https://youtu.be/852ZyRIPdjI]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link that shows the reality of what Ron Book as done in Miami-Dade county.</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/852ZyRIPdjI" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/852ZyRIPdjI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JZ		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-2/#comment-20006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 23:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure why FAC won&#039;t publish these comments (third attempt here) from a dues and legal challenge fund paying member (ME) regarding errors in the M25 complaint:

On the very first page, the wrong statute [940.0435] is referenced twice and once again on page 4. Would this be an excuse FDLE could use to throw out the complaint? Aside from that, although I didn’t check any other statutes, the complaint is well-written.

My only other concern, like Juan’s, is that relief items (f) and (g) concede that plaintiff does not consider the ex post facto requirements to be unconstitutional if they can be accommodated. I question why these are even in the complaint?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why FAC won&#8217;t publish these comments (third attempt here) from a dues and legal challenge fund paying member (ME) regarding errors in the M25 complaint:</p>
<p>On the very first page, the wrong statute [940.0435] is referenced twice and once again on page 4. Would this be an excuse FDLE could use to throw out the complaint? Aside from that, although I didn’t check any other statutes, the complaint is well-written.</p>
<p>My only other concern, like Juan’s, is that relief items (f) and (g) concede that plaintiff does not consider the ex post facto requirements to be unconstitutional if they can be accommodated. I question why these are even in the complaint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jm		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20004&quot;&gt;Sc&lt;/a&gt;.

Local pd tell me its a monthly check. But they show up sometimes months in between.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20004">Sc</a>.</p>
<p>Local pd tell me its a monthly check. But they show up sometimes months in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sc		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9817#comment-20004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20001&quot;&gt;Jm&lt;/a&gt;.

@Jm

You have 3 weeks to respond to your yearly residence check as per Florida statutes.

Keep in mind, a residence check is literally just that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/in-person-challenge-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-20001">Jm</a>.</p>
<p>@Jm</p>
<p>You have 3 weeks to respond to your yearly residence check as per Florida statutes.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, a residence check is literally just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
