<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Indiana Bill Would Violate the Constitution	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: EdC		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EdC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=24549#comment-62218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62209&quot;&gt;FAC-3&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62209">FAC-3</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EdC		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EdC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 17:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=24549#comment-62211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FAC-3		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FAC-3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 12:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=24549#comment-62209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62208&quot;&gt;EdC&lt;/a&gt;.

Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).

The Court stated that the right to travel encompasses the freedom to move between states and to establish residency in a new state without facing penalties or restrictions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62208">EdC</a>.</p>
<p>Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).</p>
<p>The Court stated that the right to travel encompasses the freedom to move between states and to establish residency in a new state without facing penalties or restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EdC		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/indiana-bill-would-violate-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-62208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EdC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 12:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=24549#comment-62208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t disagree. I&#039;m merely ignorant of any right to travel in the Constitution. The term &quot;liberty&quot; is open to interpretation as to its extent. Does anyone have a reference to a Supreme Court decision that covers the constitutional right to travel? The requirement that judges on both ends must approve the transfer is virtually the same as for a felon on federal supervised release moving between states. Supervised release is imposed as part of punishment imposed by a court for a crime. Certainly this requirement applies only to those on probation or parole and not merely to registrants, which is a civil regulatory matter; at least, that is my hope. In any case, this is an abomination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree. I&#8217;m merely ignorant of any right to travel in the Constitution. The term &#8220;liberty&#8221; is open to interpretation as to its extent. Does anyone have a reference to a Supreme Court decision that covers the constitutional right to travel? The requirement that judges on both ends must approve the transfer is virtually the same as for a felon on federal supervised release moving between states. Supervised release is imposed as part of punishment imposed by a court for a crime. Certainly this requirement applies only to those on probation or parole and not merely to registrants, which is a civil regulatory matter; at least, that is my hope. In any case, this is an abomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
