On April 19, 2018, Facebook owned Instagram, revised it’s Terms of Use.
The new version replaces the prior version, which had been in place since 2013, can be found here: http://help.instagram.com/581066165581870?helpref=page_content
Sadly, included in this months change is a ban on anyone registered as a sex offender. The restriction did not appear in the prior version.
A comprehensive online news search revealed no issues with sex offenders using the platform in the past.
I am fortunate that I do not have time to mess with Instagram. By kicking off RSO’s it give more space for drug dealers to do their business. As long as I have e-mail I couldn’t care less about these so-called social networks.
Why is this even an issue? The U.s Supreme Court saids sex offenders can use all social media as long as they are following the law.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccaheilweil1/2017/06/20/supreme-court-says-sex-offenders-cant-be-banned-from-social-media/amp/
Why is Mike Tyson still allowed to have a “vetted” Instagram??
Great question
This is a very troubling issue…I’ve been out of prison for 2 years now. I started my own business selling my artwork. Granted most of my sales are from local festivals, I find numerous vendors get leads and sales from Facebook and at least exposure through Instagram. I lose out on this opportunity and potential business lead outlet. I feel that I’m trying to change my life for the better only to get more road blocks.
I am interested in doing the same w my art. Any tips?
I was on Instagram for several years and last month I got booted , not sure I resigned up and booted again ,funny thing is now they are sending me emails to please come back ,screw them
Great question. I wonder if the path to addressing this issue should begin with a certified letter or letter from a lawyer to FB and other social media companies asking them to change their policy to reflect the Packingham ruling so they are compliance with the law?
It certainly couldn’t hurt.
Social media still have the right to ban RSO’s. Packingham simply stated that the state can’t have a statute banning them. Perhaps the court’s observation that social media run a sort of “public square” could help in a future case. An RSO ban from social media constitutes security theater that is ineffective at preventing exploitation.
Just ran across this as I am searching for info on my rights as a tier 1 registered offender. I’ve been on the registry for 8 years, and off supervised release for 2 months. I’ve discovered that I’m on the public registry, which I’m not supposed to be as a tier 1. Also, I’d like to use social media to try to rebuild my life and find new work. Is there anyone who can point me towards information or recourses. I’m kinda alone in this and feeling a bit overwhelmed and lost.
I’m sure some will find this interesting, the terms of use for Facebook and Instagram do not require you to be a registered sex offender in order to ban you, they specifically state that they ban convicted sex offenders” not registered sex offenders, so that would also include all level 1 offenders who have been convicted but not required to register. Furthermore going on right now is a public debate on several social media sites as well as news articles have been popping up in regards to Daniel Hernandez AKA Tekashi6ix9ine as he was convicted of child sex crimes relating to his 2015 arrest for using a 13 year old girl in sexual performances in no less than 4 videos all of which he uploaded to his Instagram account, the judge ruled that he would not have to register as a sex offender but the convictions remain on his record. Instagram and Facebook have been made aware of this from many users as well as a new site but they refuse to ban him from their platform, now I wonder why that is? I can tell you why, it is because they do not care 1 bit about the conviction all they care about is the address of anew that is pouring in from this controversial rapper being on their platform. if anyone here ends up taking anything to court I hope you can find this as potent ammunition for your cause. Good luck!
Since Facebook is located in California, a suit should be brought using California law under Penal Code 290.46(g)(2) which makes it illegal to use the registry information to deny access to a public business. I live in CA and there doesn’t seem to be anyone that knows about this law or uses it against these actions. As to the fact law enforcement take your internet identifiers and report them to places like Facebook, since they know Facebook will ban you (I know since I’ve seen this happen), this conduct by law enforcement is illegal under Packingham v. North Carolina. The problem is finding civil rights attorneys, resources, and the money to accomplish these suits.
With regards to the ban., it takes no money or time to chalenge facebook in district or civil court as Cals law and packingham both demonstrate a violation of law on part of facebook…
In fact., i intend to chalenge Facebook on March 23rd 2019….
How do you mean no time or money?
At minimum, filing fees, service of process, courthouse parking.
At minimum someone needs to research, draft and file the complaint.
There is nothing in Packingham to suggest that Facebook is violating the law. Packingham was about states prohibiting registrants’ Facebook use via statute. It did not require Facebook to provide access to anyone.
I would support a credible challenge, but…
What jurisdiction are you filing in? Are you looking for others to join as plaintiffs?
Wouldn’t our fight be better served by not challenging each restriction and instead lump them all up and launch a substantive due process challenge against being put on a registry that leads to all of these resteictions of liberty?
Like if there was a way to revisit doe v Alaska
Sure, but your suit would still need to identify each restriction and argue that specific right the gov’t is restricting is a protected constitutional right. Then strict scrutiny would apply instead of rational basis and you may get a court to strike it down. This is the exact way and strongest way for many suits have been brought and it seems only a very few have succeeded in winning. I think these types of suits need to be brought in every jurisdiction. The problem is resources. One needs good attorneys and money to pay for those attorneys. There seem to be very few civil rights attorneys willing to take on cases pro bono…I know, I have tried. So yes, challenge all of the restrictions.
Back to the facebook issue, Packingham could be applied to registering police departments for sending the information to facebook in order to ban you, they are in essence de facto banning you from facebook/instagram. They do this by either making a report directly to facebook if they know you have a profile, which police love to try to find in my experience, or under the Federal SORNA. SORNA allows the federal government to give social media companies, such as Facebook, access to all registry data sent to them from every state on the NCIC/NSOR to facebook itself and it’s to be used to cross reference names, birthdates, etc in order to ban profiles. Because Packingham can not apply to Facebook, it is why I mentioned using the CA penal code to bring suit for violating that statute which offers damages. If enough people bring suit and costs them enough money in CA, they may change their polices on banning sex offenders from using Facebook/Instagram.
I forgot to mention. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins as a US Supreme Court case and a few other CA Supreme Court cases have defined malls and private property as protected spaces for free speech rights in California. Packingham has defined the internet and social media sites are areas of free speech. Therefore, in applying Pruneyard in conjunction with Packingham, the operators of facebook, much like the operators of malls and stores, could not ban people from contributing free speech. AKA, facebook could not ban sex offenders from using the forum.
How did your challenge turn out?
Need help fighting this? I’m in.
Find us an attorney willing to take the case.
If the ACLU won’t take the case, then good luck finding one!
I think it’s great news every time another restriction or banning applies to all on the “sex offender” list.
Why?
Because it provides more evidence to wipe out the entire registry based on a “Substantive Due Process” challenge.
Are there individuals that should be banned from social media or traveling internationally because they actually are a danger? Sure there are. The problem is, that status of being dangerous in those circumstances hasn’t been determined as part of the fair sentencing portion of a trial, but arbitrarily by legislature and for an arbitrary duration unrelated to individual circumstances.
The legislation has also violated separation of powers by taking the Judicial power of “punish, rehabilitate, and protect the people” away from the judiciary for no good reason, and interfered with it. The legislation is supposed to create laws that apply to all, and when violated, the judiciary does their role. The legislation has created a scheme to unconstitutionally bypass the judicial role.
The 3 branches are supposed to be equal, yet the legislature has set rules for the judiciary that punishment must fit the crime and tailored to the individual circumstances without blanket restrictions based on a particular crime. Funny how the legislature has no such restrictions on itself in creating sex offender laws. They have turned the judiciary into mere administrative clerks for their agendas.
I am not sure why this hasn’t been properly challenged, other than no lawyer actually wants to be the one blamed for taking down the registry, and no “elected” state judge would ever let that happen either. Unless this gets to SCOTUS somehow, nothing will ever change.
So which group has caused more harm on Facebook, registered offenders or the latchkey junior sociopaths who these policies are allegedly designed to protect?
And in the meantime, spineless California appears to be unwilling to enforce it’s own laws regarding denial of access to “business services” based on registration.
Cal will act upon there laws., there just been no chalenge to facebooks ban…cals law is a civil remedy, not criminal.
Watch for the next NARSOS Digest for a story on Facebook Security. This is no surprise. The cops are mad as this was their legal go to platform to conduct stings. If you are a RSO you do not want to risk any compliance issue by using any file sharing sites. Facebook has major security problems far more important than those they ban are the personal accounts sold for information.
i have lived without Facebook and IG and you can too. JEV
How would they ever know if someone’s a sex offender?
I can’t see them digging to find out. Also, if they did find out would they just delete the account or notify other people why they were deleting it? That’s my only real concern. Thanks!
All states have mandated electronic identifiers included in the SO registry. Social media companies check registry data against user data and insta-ban users appearing on both lists. Facebook has done this for years. After the first time I was banned from FB, I opened a new email, registered it with FDLE as required , and opened a new FB account and registered it as required. The new FB account was banned within 48 hours.
I find it hard to believe that facebook or instagram has a specific section in their company matching user names and RSO. I would think you were reported by someone who knows you rather than FB actually digging into your personal info. They don’t have time for that.
All social media sites that request it can get the private email addresses we are forced to supply at registration. They use that list, as well as anyone reporting us to them, to delete accounts.
As I’ve said, the state governments are violating Packingham by providing the email addresses that get us banned, as well as violating Substantive Due Process by having us on a list that says we are dangerous without a court deciding that and the duration.
Since when have state governments cared about complying with the law? That’s for us peons…not them.
You are correct. Even back during Brown V Board of Education, SCOTUS ruled schools can’t be segregated, yet southern states ignored that ruling. It wasn’t until 10 years later that Congress enacted a law on that subject before southern states complied…a little…over even more time…
In Milledgeville, GA, the new desegregated high school was not built until 1971. Remember the busing protests in the 70′? Brown was decided in 1954, before the Little Rock fiasco. If you want to know how states prorate, look at these recent laws that effectively band abortion. The states know that they will lose in the loser courts. They are just hoping to get one conflicting circuit so that they can take the case to the new and improved Trumpty Dumpty Supreme Court.
Computers don’t take lunch breaks. You think that they manually scan email addresses? Why would they?
This is 2018 not 1918! You can not hide anymore and with AI being able to sift through data at a rate never before seen in human history that is more true than ever before!
Actually California doesn’t.
Nothing…not even a primary email address…much less the HUNDREDS of others that a typical person has with the modern era of communications via smartphones.
Easy, there is a auto DOJ search of your name, address, phone and location. So if false info is given they find your Location through the app. Anyone found giving false info to setup a new account will be denied. Your email is also redflagged. Plus IG really doesn’t work by using a false identity. Its a bummer for sure but as private Companies they set the rules.
Just deleted my Instagram account, I will not support a group that is part of the problem with people shaming and banishing individuals.
That’s probably the best thing that you can do!
Every Time start to see hope. Bunches more crap thrown at me.
This is not the fault of Facebook, Instagram, Nextdoor, or any of the other companies or businesses that ban us.
It is the fault of our government for putting us on a list and declared to be dangerous without any Substantive Due Process behind that declaration. Our own states forward are private email addresses to any social media site that requests it in order to ban us.
Interesting the in Packingham SCOTUS declared we have a right to use social media as the modern town square as a First Amendment right, yet the registry and the government providing our data to social media to ban us goes completely against that ruling.
If we do have any good lawyers on our side, where are the Substantive Due Process challenges that were even mentioned by SCOTUS as potentially being successful in Connecticut DPS V Doe 2003?
So when will they start booting us?
No surprise
My thing is this. My face and information is already plastered on the internet thanks to FDLE. So why in the hell would I use social media to put my stuff out there even more? I had facebook when I got out of prison but got rid of it when I saw the waste of time it really was. Oddly enough, the detectives don’t care if you have one as long as its registered. Even though they know facebook bans us. Interesting.
yes that is interesting as RSOs are using Facebook even though Facebook bans them
The internet is not a public utility, therefore every service provider is a private entity. We are always in someone’s house and must obey their rules stupid as they are. Face book is for the good people, everyone but registrants, and they don’t ban ISIS members, WTF. There is no public square on the Internet. We serve at the pleasure of the corporations.
Aren’t the telephone, cable TV, broadband, etc lines that the use are “public utilities?
does this really surprise anyone ?? 1st its us, then it will be another class of people( probably conservative minded people ). i dont know what happened to the county I grew up in.
You refuse service to a LBGT couple, you get sued and loose ( wedding cake story ) you refuse service to a guy in a MAGA hat , and you win?? (http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/04/25/judge-rules-new-york-city-bar-can-refuse-service-to-trump-supporter-wearing-maga-hat.html). i am not trying to make this political, but if a judge sides with a bar over that they can chose not to serve a patron over a political belief, how long before others follow suit and will refuse service to any RSO, not just bars/restaurants,( I mean god forbid an RSO actually buy a meal when there could be children at the place ) hell it could be grocery stores, gas stations,hospitals … you name it.. based on this Judge’s ruling, as long as you dont discriminate against the politically correct people, the others dont matter ..our current system is so out of control it scares me
Never had Facebook or any other and don’t need it. You want to reach me ? Call me or text me if I so happen to give you my number.
I don’t need a company keeping tabs on what everybody in the world is doing to collect our data and make a profit from it and to God only knows who. The thought of that alone is horrifying.
#DeleteFacebook
Ah, Instagram
A place that influences Narcissism, Internet trolls and cyber bullying. Everybody is tough with their abusive commenting opinions behind a digital profile and screen.
Facebook owned Instagram has a lot of bigger problems than putting restrictions on non existent security and safety issues. They can start with the problems caused by their own actions.
@FAC
Segregation is illegal. How is this any different? Has there been or is there a challenge currently either in the works or in development to go after this on the same basis?
How exactly is this legally any different that a Business is allowed to discriminate against a type of individual any different than doing the same for Sexual Orientation, or Skin color?????
Anon for now
Because sexual orientation and race are considered protected classes. Sex offenders are not.
Shouldn’t all Citizens be a protected Class? Is there not an argument in perhaps changing the outdated verbage to our advantage?
True this is an unpopular topic but so too was Rape, abuse, etc…decades later this is now in the public eye. (#metoo)
Can we not take a page from the current social storm and spin it to something that would be advantageous for all and not just ourselves?
Example: The homeless, a registered sex offender, etc. There is no difference between the humans other than their circumstance. I feel that there is an avenue here to explore for the greater good of our Society as a whole to take a step towards Exclusionism.
Anon for now
no – race, gender, sexual orientation, age, are all classes that an individual has no choice but to be a part of. They are born that way.
A criminal offender is not the same.
@FAC
The devil is in the details…please re-read
To say that a person has “NO Choice” but to be a part of with regards to Sexual Orientation is closed-minded. That is completely false. Anyone has the right to choose what their sexual orientation is. (Not that I agree with that)
That being said within the same context again please reread:
To use the argument NOT just for RSOs but all Citizens. For no reason shall an American Citizen be discriminated against to do business against.
That’s the point.
FAC, you say,
“no – race, gender, sexual orientation, age, are all classes that an individual HAS NO CHOICE but to be a part of. They are born that way.
A criminal offender is not the same.
I think the highlighted part would apply to the Fla Registry…
Seeing my “offense date” was 4-94
And the Reg. Law went into effect in 12-96.
I thought that in 2007 they lowered the restrictions for people before the Reg. date?
I was just told (by BSO) that I can go to schools, Parks, car shows, city events and the such with no problems. That I was “grandfathered in” under the 2007 ruling.
It was the same year that they did away with the law that said if you went 25 years without another offense, and you were only arrested once, you could apply to have your records sealed, expunged, and have your name deleted from the registry.
Mine was 1993.. depends on individual State Laws. in Florida registration begins on your date of release. City Ordinances may apply when it comes to visiting parks and schools etc.
Stay Safe
Anyone who supports the Registries is an enemy to all decent Americans. Registry Terrorists must treated exactly as the criminals that they are. Wage war.
FRT I totally agree with you! They are no friend of American values as stated in our constitution.
Actions like this make fuel the fire already burning against RSOs! Actions like this reinforce the stereotypes AND profiling that we are trying to overcome!
Actions like this from companies that are used by the majority “prove” to Mr and Mrs Joe Six-pack that we should be all feared and all treated the same – banished – not safe to have around the decent folk…BULLSHIT
Please check out my site SexOffenderTruth.com which points out just how un-American the registry is and also just how useless the label of “sex offender” is and how it actually makes it easier for those most likely – someone a child already knows – to actually abuse a child – NOT anyone on their deceptive, lie based list!
“BULLSHIT” is quite accurate. And F those people. Straight to hell.
I like the look of your website. I don’t have a lot of time right now but I’ve bookmarked and will definitely try to make it a point to check it out.
The millions of people who are affected by these Registries need to stand up and tell the terrorists to go F themselves. It is far, far past time to stop trying to be nice to the harassers. It is time to shove these Registries up their rear ends.
There will be acute depression and possible suicides for the Juvenile and young RSO that loses their Social Media access and habits. And in no way or form are these bans a deterrent from capitol offenses being committed by characters you may meet on line.
Never used it. What did I miss?
You didn’t miss much just the desocialization of the human race.
Oh, well – then, good! I really don’t want to miss out on anything “important.”
They could not pay me to have a Facebook account. Another organization running in fear from a non-existent threat. Good to know that armed home invaders, armed car jackers, drug dealers , etc still have access to their tools of the trade.
I agree with Capt. Munsey they could not pay me to use Facebook. My opinion is that Facebook is just as bad as any Federal and/or State Registry. It destroys families by posting personal arguments or in house fighting between family members. Then some person wants to comment with their 2 cents worth of advice to fuel those arguments. I guess common criminals love Facebook some fool posts they going on vacation or they on vacation and some burglar trolls the posts and breaks into the fools house back home because they are at Over priced Disneyland in Florida. They get rob twice: One from the burglar and two from Disney.Even if I were not on any Registry I wouldn’t go to Disney in Fla or CA. The cost to park your car is what $20-$30 dollars per day.And that is not even the Entrance Fee. which was $25.50 I heard its close to $75.00
Of course. Instagram is owned by Facebook. Zuckerberg thinks he owns the world.
…and it’s high time that something be done to knock the Zuckerberg jerk off his high pedestal!
Typical of the fear mongering and scapegoating of both government and corporate institutions. Consider the following from Clarence Darrow.
“As long as the world shall last there will be wrongs, and if no man objected and no man rebelled, those wrongs would last forever.”
“The world is made up for the most part of morons and natural tyrants, sure of themselves, strong in their own opinions, never doubting anything”
California law specifically prohibits banishment of sex offenders from business establishments, among other things. It is highly likely that Instagram is using facial recognition, among other data points to identify and block users on the platform. Remember folks, Instagram is owned by Facebook, so this surprises me this didn’t happen sooner.
Instagram is a business who operates it’s business from Menlo, Park, California is now in fact breaking the law.
As a software developer, I am not even allowed to have an account so that I can integrate and build apps on the platform, or perform integrations with the service to people’s websites.
THAT is very interesting. Can you contact the California Attorney General’s office and ask if they think Facebook and/or Instagram is breaking the law? Is there any way for a citizen to make a formal request for an investigation and/or an opinion? How about contacting some county attorneys? I’m not a California citizen or I might.
If they are breaking the law, that would be too sweet. It would be up to big government to prosecute them. If they don’t want to, I wonder how much pressure could be brought upon them?
I’ve said many times that it ought to be illegal for any government to use Facebook or Instagram. It is simply not acceptable that government would use a mechanism that actively prevents U.S. citizens from access. Smells like a lawsuit to me but WTF do I know?
California the most Liberal State registers soft offenders for the duration of their lives. Some county’s such as Orange have considered banning offenders altogether. I grew up next to Menlo Park a affluent community with their own agendas.
It’s just another case of legal discrimination in the name of public safety, with no evidence to support it. Since Instagram and other social media platforms have become important avenues for promoting your business, policies like this have real economic impact for registered sex offenders too. Hopefully some good lawyers will file suit to attack the policy from that angle.
Unfortunately “good lawyers” only are interested when their rather ridiculous fees are prepaid – not really interested in justice but rather money – so don’t hold your breath. Sad but very true.
That’s a completely false statement.
We just honored a great lawyer this past Friday who has not taken a PENNY from us.
A multi-billion dollar company like Facebook would make this challenge VERY expensive. transcripts of depositions alone could easily cost in the tens of thousands of dollars! Do you know people in any profession that would not only provide their services for free, but would pay all the costs out of pocket?
to FAC—YES ! almost ANY Injury Attorney, lawsuit attorney, slip & fall, pipe lawsuit, ACLU attorney will take your case if they feel you have been wronged.
(its called “PRO BONO” For Free) OR, they will take it on a “contingency basis” ( they dont get nothing if you dont get nothing”)
But alas, NOTHING is free in this country. The “little guy/us” cant afford big high priced fancy attorneys, like the corporations can.
So does that mean “justice” can be bought and paid for at a whim?? That if I am right and the corporations are wrong; the corporations can just throw money around and sway the case?
That we have NO Constitution, no Bill of Rights and no justice in this country UNLESS YOU HAVE MONEY???
What happened to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”??
We are guaranteed free attorneys for criminal cases, not civil.
It is criminal that they are allowed to do this to ANY race, color, creed, political affiliation, high class, lower class, poverty level, homeless, sex offenders, anyone.
Yes, sex offenders, we are a class.
Just like the Japanese were in 1941-1943. Just round them up and put them in camps because they might be a threat. No evidence to back it up (just made up $h!t)
I will continue to contribute to the cause.
Is there ANY way we can charge the Book’s (lauren & Ron) with a criminal charge? hate crime? Discrimination? RICO??
You are completely correct that we are an artificially created class. We did not choose to be included and classified as so-called “sex offenders” and we can not change this label nor can we get out of the group/class.
So we are being profiled, stereotyped, and discriminated against because of being in this class.
If they denied housing to someone who is gay – they would be sued.
If they denied housing to someone who is black – they would be sued.
If they denied housing to someone who is Jewish – they would be sued.
Yet, we can be denied housing and endless other examples of legal discrimination based solely on being included in this classification (class) of “sex offenders.”
Yes, it is a hate crime. Yes, it is blatant endless punishment and discrimination!
@ Sean you got proof or evidence the books committed a crime? A personal vendetta against books is not going to work neither heresay against a wealthy family. As much as I like to see them get caught well you have dreams on one hand and $hit on the other hand. Which one will be fulfilled first?
Joseph,
Evidence?
Book is a slick politician.
So is Hillary.
All you need is “political pull” and $$$$ and you can get away with murder, even if you are caught with the gun in your hand.
Just look at Broward County….
Lead Sex Crimes Prosecutor, Stacy Honowitz was caught shoplifting, arrested….. then the charge “mysteriously went away”
Sheriff Scott Isreal’s son took a hockey stick/baseball bat and tried to sexually assault a student @ Marjory Douglas High School, one year before the fateful shooting.
WHO was the investigating officer? Scott Peterson, yes, the same cop who hid in a stairwell while 17 people were murdered.
(Oh, that case mysteriously “went away” also— so called lack of evidence)
So here are just 2 cases where judicial, political pull and money makes things “go away”.
So please DEFEND Mr Book all you want. I will gladly have a big handful of $h!t to wipe in his face when he slips up and cant wiggle out of his hatred for RSO’s
Using one’s wealth to deprive others of their constitutional rights is a crime…i.e. Books.
@ Sean you making guesses that book is tired in with the sheriff,and yes The state Attorney gotten away with a crime; I wasn’t happy about that. I am not defending Books. From your last reply It seems that you trying to connect dots that might not even connect. It is true and I agree with you to a certain point money buys justice. Let us not forget that girl Megan in Jersey or Jessica From Citrus County.Like everyone else I would go slap off if someone messed with my Niece. People are tired of losing a child, that is one of the most painful things a person can every endure. But where are those young girls justice? I don’t like to be on the registry anymore than the next person. Mr Book is a monster to me because he failed to be a parent to his daughter. As far as the cops’s son who did that to the other student Did you call the newspapers or tv station and asked them to do a follow up. Maybe they still investigating in? Coming on here to rant and rave with anger, Why not do what Derek L does. Get posters and bullhorn and protest her actions in front of her office or get others involved. I don’t know you But concern you might put yourself in the hospital because you letting yourself become angry. We all suffer injustice, I committed my crime,on the other hand what about those who are real victims
Joesph,
Dont you read the other posts that FAC puts out? FAC put out a post (or member sub) that Ron Book was one of the people invited to a big dinner for political reasons. Please try to keep up on FAC’s posts.
As far as the Sheriff…….
He is done/fired. He “says” that he wants to run for election in 2020. Fat chance of him getting elected.
Oh you might say “he had no responsibility” for the 17 that got killed. HE is in charge. He is/was top dog.
I tried to follow up on the “attempted sexual assault” committed by the Sheriffs son. It was buried (corruption). Scott Peterson was the “investigating officer” on that. It was buried before it even became a 30 second blurb on the news.
YES, the same Scott Peterson who hid in a stairwell while 17 people were MURDERED. Peterson did NOT do what he took an oath to— “Protect and serve” NOT hide in fear.
All you have to do is to read ALL of the posts here and on other sites (Once Fallen) to know what is going on, instead of asking for info that has already been provided.
The ACLU is your best bet. No private attorney will ever take a case against Zuckerscum on a contigency basis!
I think that this is hilarious. “They” want to keep tabs” on all RSO’s, yet they ban us which only DEFEATS their whole logic—–to keep tabs on RSO’s.
Now you DONT know what we (RSO’s) are doing. Kinda defeats the purpose of “watching us”
The same has been true of MeetUp for awhile already.