Comments on: Judge: Sex offender GPS monitoring lawsuit can proceed https://floridaactioncommittee.org/judge-sex-offender-gps-monitoring-lawsuit-can-proceed/ Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:08:38 +0000 hourly 1 By: jackson https://floridaactioncommittee.org/judge-sex-offender-gps-monitoring-lawsuit-can-proceed/comment-page-1/#comment-2059 Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:08:38 +0000 http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=2681#comment-2059 In reply to Karen.

The Supreme Court agreed that GPS monitoring is a search, even if it is not a criminal search (The state argued that it was a civil search in nature) But the court said it must be determined whether such a search is reasonable, which affects its constitutionality. They punted that question back to the state supreme court. See Grady v. North Carolina 14-593

]]> By: Karen https://floridaactioncommittee.org/judge-sex-offender-gps-monitoring-lawsuit-can-proceed/comment-page-1/#comment-2058 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:34:58 +0000 http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=2681#comment-2058 I am curious about this case – didn’t the Supreme Court of the US just rule that GPS monitoring does indeed constitute illegal search and seizure? If so, then once a registered citizen completes the adjudicated sentence everything after is civil is it not? Then forcing a registered citizen to wear GPS as a factor of the registry would be illegal search and seizure? Anyone here know anything else about that?

]]>