Edward

I believe it was a lot more than the number you are stating. They pretty much retroactively applied this to not only those who served their sentences before the registry, but also those who who were sentenced before the registry.

If a man/woman was arrested for a sex offense in 1980 and released in 1998 (a year after the registry was implemented) they gots to register up. My incident took place in 1991. I have had to register since 1997 for life.

Not only that they keep changing and adding new crap (Requirments) at every opportunity they get. They changed me from 2 times a year registration to 4 times a year. Recently the clerk at the sheriffs office said they were told the Florida legislature was looking into having some offenders register monthly. That would be a nightmare. Sounds more and more like probation.

If you’re talking about ex post facto registration, somewhere between 1,400 and 2,000 registrants were unlucky enough to feel what truly “being stripped of your Constitutional rights guaranteed by the United States of America” felt like, according to my attorney I am currently working with.

FAC…Not going ‘overboard’ but stating a potential real-life situation….
As was said in an earlier post, We shall be EXTRA vigilant now, due to passing of 2 Distinguished FBI Agents who were doing their jobs in their line of duty,,,,,

‘WE’ all could really get the short end of the stick….All I was pointing out was a real life situation that may occur for those stuck in Flori-DUH!

Your argument is “spot” on. Its much like what is a day? from 12:00am to 11:59pm? A business “day”? How about within 48 hours? Does that include weekends or holidays? What does within mean? To answer your question you must report ALL scars including surgical, visible or not or face a 3rd degree felony.

You still missed my point but that’s fine. I do think you trust LE and the State to act honorably more than I do.

“Too many people have such as misguided and misinformed idea of what this filing is about. I wish more people would have tuned into our monthly member call this past week to learn first hand, rather than perpetuate misinformation in this forum.”

Sorry I missed the call as I was attending to a family emergency. I didn’t realize expressing my concern would have me vilified as “perpetuating misinformation.”

How foolish it would be for us not to give the court the option of an as-applied ruling.

A win will benefit ALL on the registry.
The change was only because of a STANDING OF THE NAMED PLAINTIFFS issue. It changes nothing about the case.
Too many people have such as misguided and misinformed idea of what this filing is about. I wish more people would have tuned into our monthly member call this past week to learn first hand, rather than perpetuate misinformation in this forum. THIS IS NOT (N-O-T) TO HELP JUST ONE PERSON. The case is FACIAL and as applied and the only reason why someone recently added was named was because there is no question she will not be barred by the statute of limitations.