Comments on: Legal Update: Response to Defendant’s MTD Filed in Ex Post Facto Plus Case

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:31:55 +0000

In reply to David. Oral arguments took place last week, no word yet. There have been several updated posted subsequent to this one.

By: David⚜️

David⚜️ — Sun, 22 Nov 2020 21:40:17 +0000

UPDATE?? Is there any news on this case??

By: Anthony Harden

Anthony Harden — Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:59:24 +0000

Wow that was a great read I have a 96 case and I had no idea I was going to be a registered sex offender I knew nothing about sexual offenses so yes I took the deal 15 versus 2 years 5 years probation I was scared not knowing took public defenders word . But yes great read, hope that the courts stop playing politics with people lives to much money involved in the courts hate to say that but money rules over justice and common sense

By: David_P

David_P — Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:08:26 +0000

Well-written, well-argued. Well worth reading! A pleasure to read if you like good legal arguments.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Sun, 02 Feb 2020 14:32:20 +0000

In reply to DavidM.

I do think SCOTUS will take this up several year’s from now in the event of a circuit split— say, between our circuit, in this case, the 6th, and the 10th. Nine state supreme courts already have ruled in our favor on one of the legal issues raised here.

But an even better scenario would be for SCOTUS to deny cert if applied for by the STATE, in the event THEY don’t get what they want here.

For now, I’m just waiting for this Federal district judge to conclude, this filing is just far too compelling to justify simply dismissing with prejudice.

By: DavidM

DavidM — Sat, 01 Feb 2020 22:46:38 +0000

Jacob
You are correct . I just didn’t phrase it right, I believe it was a similar case from another state last year that they refused to take up.

By: Media

Media — Sat, 01 Feb 2020 22:28:49 +0000

In reply to David. I agree.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Sat, 01 Feb 2020 17:58:37 +0000

In reply to DavidM. SCOTUS hasn’t refused anything here. They haven’t even been asked. This is still at district court level.

By: Just Jay

Just Jay — Sat, 01 Feb 2020 12:02:22 +0000

In reply to DavidM. DavidM, I support and share you written thoughts.

By: Just Jay

Just Jay — Sat, 01 Feb 2020 12:01:09 +0000

In reply to David. Amen.