Comments on: Lifetime Registration for Florida Sex Offenders Isn’t ‘Custody’

By: Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs — Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:57:51 +0000

Ok I was wrong after looking at this rule or guide under Article 5 https://www.supremecourt.gov/casehand/Guidance-on-Scheduling-2023.pdf
So it was supposed to go to Conference awhile ago and the state has ask for and received an extension which they now just summited the paperwork (lies). So now the clock starts and according to this page https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule2023.pdf
If it was summited on the 24th and they wait the customary 2 weeks then looking at he filled IPF (which is indigent) vs paid so that now makes it November 9th distribution schedule with December 1 being the conference.

Again I could be wrong but just my semi-research opinion.

By: Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs — Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:46:41 +0000

In reply to Tearfuleagle.

Looking at this page https://www.scotusblog.com/ and scrolling down to the bottom of the page the last conference for the year is slated for this Friday. So I assume but don’t quote me on this that the conference will be held Friday for it, otherwise we have to wait awhile.
As for how will this effect our daily life I have no idea. It seems more people should be aware about this since it’s at the cusp of the Supreme Court potentially hearing it.

By: Tearfuleagle

Tearfuleagle — Tue, 24 Oct 2023 21:59:59 +0000

In reply to Eugene V. Debs. Any word on when this is slated for conference? And if I can ask how would this effect our day to day?

By: Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs — Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:08:04 +0000

In reply to Eugene V. Debs. Now that both side’s briefs are in, will FAC summit a paper to the Supreme Court as to why they should hear this case?

By: Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs — Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:19:13 +0000

Florida response https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-107/285789/20231023120751323_23-107%20-%20Clements%20v.%20Florida%20et%20al.%20-%20BIO%20for%20filing.pdf

By: Eugene V Debs

Eugene V Debs — Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:47:43 +0000

In reply to LMC. Do you have a link? Or know what lawyer, hopefully with a lawyer he can show exclusion zones that directly tell you where you may or may not live and have a stronger case to present.

By: LMC

LMC — Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:58:26 +0000

IT IS NOT OVER YET! An Attorney has signed on for rehearing en banc asking for the Court to consider the residency restrictions.

By: JZ

JZ — Sun, 05 Mar 2023 16:06:08 +0000

How are we NOT “in custody” when being on the registry IS “under sentence of a court!?!” I didn’t put myself on the registry!

Is FAC working with “New Challenger” on this?

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

By: New Challenger

New Challenger — Mon, 27 Feb 2023 03:19:25 +0000

Dear FAC, I meet the “in custody” requirements stated in this recent 11th Circuit decision because I am on lifetime probation. I will volunteer to bring a new challenge under this decision if needed. You can contact me at the email address I will provide with this comment to you. This is a great opportunity to force the federal courts to address the issues that the 11th Circuit pointed out regarding lifetime registration and residency restrictions.

By: Tereto

Tereto — Sun, 19 Feb 2023 00:12:55 +0000

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/amazon-sued-over-refusal-hire-california-sex-offenders-2022-09-23/

Another news worthy article.