I personally feel we’re already there. The process just hasn’t completed, yet.

Likewise, who ever heard of someone presenting their ID (emblazoned or not) prior to committing a crime!

For community safety, the public needs to know he was convicted of a sex offense before he buys a six-pack?? Before he cashes a check?? Before he has a document notarized?? Why?? And why the Hell does law enforcement need to know, so they can more readily harrass him??

(My employer reimburses me for mileage. Each year I and required to update my mileage reimbursement paperwork with a photocopy of my driver’s license, my vehicle registration, and proof of liability insurance. I’m sure having “Sex Offender” emblazoned on my DL would be just grand.🙄😩)

@CJ,

Yes, I have seen it. Maybe our government did too and enacted the Walsh Crime Bill based on it.

Ottis Toole confessed to killing Adam, yet we are all paying for his crime, in perpetuity.

JZ

Everyone should watch the movie called Minority Report with Tom Cruise if you haven’t already. The basis was people were arrested for things they “MIGHT” do in the future.

Agreed, JZ.

Replace the words waist bracelet with Drivers license.

@Detroit,

I’m not pushing anything, just stating my opinion based on my experience with the registry. Edward Snowden exposed the FACT that our government is spying on US 24/7/365. The “Patriot” Act is still in effect. When one political party controls the Presidency, Senate, and House of Representatives, that IS a one-party system.

We are sent back to prison for technical/administrative violations where we are very likely to be murdered by other inmates with the FDOC compliance, i.e. exterminated. We are civilly confined indefinitely based on thought crime, i.e. permanent incarceration. In MY opinion, anyone who believes the registry will ever end is living in a fool’s paradise. I do contribute to FAC, every month, and have contributed to the ACLU.

“I am waiting for all released inmates to get bar codes tattooed to their forearms to keep track of be scanned upon demand.”

They couldn’t do that, that’s considered “Branding” But they could require by law you wear waist bracelet micro-chipped, bar coded with large red letters “SEX OFFENDER”.

Removal, destruction, altering or concealment of “State property” would be a third degree felony punishable with a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years imprisonment and $10,000.00 fine.

This statutory requirement does not create a new crime nor is the penalty impose punishment rather it is the legislators intent to create a regulatory sanction needed to protect the public from the “Sex Offender”

That is the dumbest damn argument I think I have ever read. All someone needs to do is a study on the rate of offenses before and after this law went into effect and I am positive one would find it hasn’t made anyone safer.