Comments on: Man found guilty of killing 2 sex offenders

By: CherokeeJack

CherokeeJack — Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:24:49 +0000

Michael

AND, if you were honest and registered the Facebook account, most of the time, once facebook gets that notification from the FDLE, they close your account (Based on those on here who have had that happen to them when they registered their social media)
Catch 22, you lose either way. That is why I stay as far away from social media as possible.

By: Michael Baez

Michael Baez — Wed, 24 Dec 2025 00:49:56 +0000

I am a victim of Florida’s unjust policies against registered sex offenders. Over a year ago, I was arrested by the fugitive task force for failing to disclose a Facebook account. Was my email attached to the account not enough? They practically sent a SWAT team to my home terrorizing my family. I was not home at the time…. I was at work. I waited at work for the task force to arrest me. My original offense was over 30 yrs ago in another state in which my obligation to register was completed. I have been a model citizen since then. Never in trouble and always complying to state and local laws. That did not matter in my case. Florida just wanted a conviction to stack numbers. I am now a 2 time felon on a 4 yr probationary period because of a FACEBOOK ACCOUNT. How is a man supposed to live a normal life today without social media. It is a requirement. I am not restricted from using the internet so why cant I have some normalcy. Supporting and organization such as FAC is great but only if the Law Makers listen. We all know they never will when it comes to those who are forced to register at gun point. That is how it feels. Making the registry to the public is nothing more than criminal. It places families lives in peril. The lawmakers don’t care. It is event that they don’t care …… look at who our President is.

By: CherokeeJack

CherokeeJack — Sat, 20 Dec 2025 00:00:35 +0000

In reply to No end. Well either way, most of us say "We will believe it when we see it" concerning being released from the registry. I do not understand why some states have a good path off, and others like Florida could care less if you rot in the ground. Wait, I am wrong, then they would lose those registry funds, so we need to stay alive right? There is no mercy or compassion for those with our charges. And by posting our names, photos and addresses, it puts us in danger, and not just us, but our families as well.

By: No end

No end — Fri, 19 Dec 2025 17:21:17 +0000

In reply to CherokeeJack. LE as in all of them, from legislatures on down.

By: James

James — Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:14:42 +0000

Let’s all face the fact that we are on a list designed to target us. The diversionary tactic used by the government has been used by the likes of Adolf Hitler, Mousellini, Yao, Alexander, Ghangis Khan, Hannible, and many others in the past. Truth is that it is taught in the War College for our Special Forces and Spec Ops units.
To distract the populace by giving them a common enemy and to dehumanize a group so that nobody is offended by them being targeted.
I have been attacked physically, I’ve had my lug nuts loosened in an attempt to kill me. I’ve had a brake line cut. The list goes on and on with the same response by the cops that there was nothing they could do.
The fight to end the registry will be won with our blood being spilled. As until we are attacked enough and have bled enough nobody is going to give a crap. I worry about who the next scapegoat will be.

By: James

James — Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:03:17 +0000

In reply to CherokeeJack. Same here. I have a new one currently that just bought. Then went door to door to "warn" my neighbors about me. It isn't going well for the newb as I am very respected by the majority of my neighbors. People ard getting to the point where they are caring less about the label as everyone seems to know someone on the list.

By: Derek W. Logue of OnceFallen.com

Derek W. Logue of OnceFallen.com — Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:04:56 +0000

I have had past experience dealing with Local 12 when I lived in Cincinnati. They are run by Sinclair, so they are strongly slanted to the political right, and so this is how Sinclair stations operate.

By: Jake

Jake — Fri, 19 Dec 2025 02:03:23 +0000

In reply to obvious answers. What you wrote is what I have believed all long.

By: obvious answers

obvious answers — Thu, 18 Dec 2025 23:09:02 +0000

To answer the comments “Why don’t they or they should just pull down the registry” What occurred is the registry’s sole true purpose all along.
Surely you didn’t believe the official claim that the sex offender registry exists purely to protect the public, did you? If public safety were genuinely the goal—if the system were designed to warn communities about the most dangerous predators—then why is there no equivalent public registry for drug dealers who flood streets with lethal opioids, murderers who take innocent lives, arsonists who burn homes and schools, or other violent offenders whose crimes routinely kill, maim, addict, and traumatize children?
The absence of those registries is telling. Law enforcement isn’t incompetent or lazy enough to overlook an obviously effective tool. Police, prosecutors, and policymakers know exactly how registries function in practice. If broad public listing actually prevented crime and saved investigative resources, we would have registries for every serious offense—domestic batterers, gang members, drunk drivers, fentanyl traffickers, you name it.
But we don’t. Only one category of offender is singled out for lifelong public branding and extrajudicial punishment.
That stark inconsistency exposes the registry for what it has always been: not a shield for society, but a deliberate outlet for society’s rage—a state-sanctioned scapegoat that distracts, divides, and quietly serves power by giving the public an acceptable target to hate. The real purpose isn’t protection. It never was.

By: obvious answers

obvious answers — Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:56:22 +0000

Why do critics relentlessly scrutinize the past convictions of deceased victims on the sex offender registry, while barely mentioning the perpetrator’s heinous crimes? This pattern reveals the unspoken truth now being said aloud: the registry was never truly about public safety—it has always functioned as a de facto hunting license for vigilantes.
The courts know this. Congress knows this. The executive branch knows this. And it operates exactly as designed.
At its core, the registry is a punitive mechanism crafted to channel public outrage toward a vulnerable, unarmed group that is systematically denied the right to defend itself. It serves as a modern-day bread and circus: distract and unify the population against an easy target, thereby shielding the government from the people’s broader anger and frustration.
This deflection works brilliantly. By handing the masses someone they can collectively despise and attack without consequence, those in power buy themselves insulation from legitimate scrutiny and rage. It’s the same ancient tactic, repackaged for today—give the crowd a scapegoat, and the real issues fade into the background.