thank you Jacob for clearing up the matter.

Paul did NOT say, did he, that no one who committed a crime against an adult had any problem at any border crossing. Not even the Registrant Travel Matrix goes that far.

It partly depends on the receiving country and what their policies are. We know from RTAG that some countries, for example, admit hardly any former felons at all.

All we can say is that if someone was denied due to a past crime against an ADULT, then it was not the doing of International Megan’s Law but some other law or policy (or combination thereof).

Rocky – This site is not a source for legal opinions. FAC is not a law firm, we do not have lawyers on staff and the individuals responding to your questions are providing anecdotal information based on past information and belief.

The IML, as all registration laws, are complex and not uniformly applied. While IML is a Federal Law that should apply nationwide, some states’ laws vary in application and some states are not AWA Compliant and if you are not required to register in their state and show up to report international travel, they might be confused or their state agency might not report it to the US Marshals in which case no green notice is sent. There are also other registration laws aside from IML which might come into play. These are all “mights” – if you ask whether Federal law authorizes the sending of travel notifications for persons on the registry regardless of whether their offense was against a minor:

Travel notifications are sent by the Angel Watch Center pursuant to 34 U.S.C. § 21503(f) AND the National Sex Offender Targeting Center pursuant to 34 U.S.C. § 21504(a)(1) (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 16935c(a)(1)). The Angel Watch Center is limited in its ability to make notifications of foreign travel to cases where a person is registered on the basis of an offense against a minor, the National Sex Offender Targeting Center is not.

I hope that answer satisfies you and we can move on from this topic. As complex as the laws are for attorneys and law enforcement officers to understand, they are even more confusing for the “regular” person. You seem frustrated because you are not getting the specifics you are looking for, but unfortunately the only person who can do the research and draft an opinion for your situation is someone who is qualified to do the research and licensed to provide the opinion. If you are having a legal issue related to international travel for which you need actual legal guidance, we have a list of lawyers on our referral page.

I don’t think you are understanding my post. There is a contradiction between RTAG (Paul) and someone on here about whether SOs with adult cases are being denied entry into foreign countries. Whenever there is a contradiction of information, you try to collect more evidence to see what is true and what is false. I need evidence of SOs with adult cases being denied entry into a foreign country.

Thank you Jacob!
rock wants proof in hand, proof he will never get, and this country will NEVER admit to wrong doing the way the green notices are written its to inform that a RP is in route its up to the other country to make that decision
In or out.

HongKong
same guy I know has been there 8x he is RP IML sent green notices they pull him in ask questions and allowed him in every time cause his wife from the Philippines arrived there ahead of him
until IML and the registry is #abolished we have to just suck it up.

I think he’s saying, a person he knows who committed a crime against an adult, was denied entry into a country. That’s that country’s prerogative. What proof do you need?

If you are subject to an Interpol green notice, some countries may deny you entry, regardless of whether there is a mark on your passport.

rocky
adult or a offense against a minor they send green notices OK
they dont claim your offense is for a child or an adult their main focus on destroying a persons life, it letting the country know you are a reg,Person its part of IML

US Marshall’s and Angel Watch are the entries that send green notices its there Job. and why are they sending these notices?
it all started with the 21 day notice to your local sheriffs dept do you see a check mark box to claim adult offense or offense with a minor? possible the issue starts there,

stamp or not, adult or not granted no matter what you have been told from tag.
it still happens and will keep happening, you can have all the proof in hand to prove what is happening but for the fact our government is going to claim the country of destination has a right to refuse a RP for any reason. thusfore your SOL on any kind of lawsuit

and FYI find this Blog this green notice was accidentally left in the RPs paperwork when he was deported yes Adult offense do you see anywhere it says he had adult offense?
NO just a RSO/a registered SO ….it is an IML notice

#experienced on January 9, 2020 at 9:24 am
Int’l Mess on January 9, 2020 at 1:08 pm

This letter is not intended to cause a hold departure order on the subject,it is only provided for us in assessing eligibility for admission

If other Posters on this page would like to Jump in and correct me if im wrong please do..

I don’t need his name. I need proof that he has an adult case and was denied entry because it contradicts Paul’s info. There is too much fake information being spread online. Hence, we need a reference, news article, letter, evidence, etc., to show that US Marshalls and Angel Watch are not following the rules.

Rock
we discussed earlier and I cant divulge a Reg persons name he has my full respect of privacy
but what i can say he was blacklisted in 2016 from Philippines he notified 21 days in advance his offence was a date rape trump up charge I know well I read his reports ADULT offence

since November of 2019 he was released and want to move on with his life Im helping him now get back into the Philippines its going to be a long Journey But I’ve done this before with another person and including myself in December 2013 and back in April of 2014 use your letter of release proof of a marriage and I told his wife to by property and get sign agreement of his co- ownership of land

Any proof because according to Paul at RTAG you are wrong? Please provide proof that this is happening to people with no mark on their passport.