Jjjj

I’m not a super hero but thanks for the compliment. When I see or hear about an injustice across the country I make sure my voice is heard loudly. You are correct I used to live in Florida; but I left the state about a year ago. If there’s anything I can do to help let me know. United we stand; divided we fall and it’s time to knock this dam known as the registry Just like the Berlin Wall fell!!

Is that Illinois or Missouri? information as this is on the Mo site
On June 16, 2009 the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that federally mandated registration requirements under the Sexual Offenders Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) applies to individuals who committed a sex offense prior to July 20, 2006. Therefore, SORNA imposes an independent obligation requiring respondents to register as sex offenders in Missouri. The independent registration requirement under SORNA operates irrespective of any allegedly retrospective state law that has been enacted and may be subject to the Article 1, Section 13 of the Missouri State Constitution.
same BS they blew smoke on in an email

entire Page
https://www.mshp.dps.missouri.gov/MSHPWeb/PatrolDivisions/CRID/SOR/factsheet.html#2009

Hey #experiened
I have looked at the federal statute, and it say some sort of mumbo jumbo about interstate commerce.
That could be important.
Also, as far as I can see, the federal law simply takes a state’s charge of failure to register and add a federal charge to it with steeper penalties.
So the federal obligation to register does not exist – only a federal penalty for not registering. There is no federal registry. There are only state, territorial and tribal registries.
When they are put into one webpage conglomerate, they are called a federal registry. But a fed registry does not, in fact, exist.
Also, I think that the fed penalty in only triggered if you have also engaged in interstate commerce in addition to a stat’s failure to register.
Just my opinion. And I am not a lawyer.
If you need my source materials on the subject, just let me know and I will share a link to my archives.

I believe we all need to speak out I think @ Brandon is in Florida yet standing up for others rights in other state issues

we are all in this together people on the registry and off we need to stand NOW

Im currently researching Missouri and Illinois for sanctuary from this life if hell
so far seems Missouri says it dont matter if your on or off your still registering yet what they are doing is unconstitutional making people believe they have to register when they really dont.. I have a email from Adele on that as well

The idea of an “independent federal duty to register” under SORNA is completely bogus, IMO, and I’m quite surprised that Missouri is pushing that as a basis for retroactive registration.

Ill have more on Illinois this week

Brandon, you are a super-hero!!! I believe you said, in another post, that you are not even a Florida resident. Well, in my opinion, that makes your contributions that much more appreciated!

Thanks for helping us out !!!

Everyone that speaks up is a hero to us!!!!

Thanks Again! 🙂 🙂 🙂

Does anybody have the link from the committee meeting about Michigan’s proposed bill? I need that for ammunition to my arguments that the majority of the residents were against the bill.

Jjjj

I will read the bill and be writing my own emails this evening. Lately I wanted the people I know that live in Michigan to make their voice heard before I did anything. I have no problem writing for my opposition to proposed bills. No problem for calling me out either

Here is the contact info for the bill’s author: http://gophouse.org/representatives/central/lower/contact-rep-lower/

Here is the text of what I sent (it may sound a bit testy, but I believe that measure outrage is called for):

Dear Sir:
Although I am from a different state (Florida), I feel it incumbent upon me to briefly express my thoughts on proposed House Bill 5679, as I am taken aback at your proposed changes to the existing law.

Sir, the several rulings from the courts have said, in sum total, that a complete overhaul of Michigan’s broken registry system must be undertaken; for, a great many parts of the current legislation are blatantly unconstitutional!

You have proposed nothing more than a few minor definitional changes and are trying to establish at least 50 new registry systems, within Michigan, by insisting that emigrants from other states be held to the state-of-origin’s enacted statutes. This leads me to believe that you have absolutely no respect for any constitution, nor any law!

You have refused to abide by the judiciary!

If your bill (or any legislation similar to it) is passed by your congress, you will have collectively snubbed your noses at the rule of law!

Truly,

Sir, have you read the bill that they are proposing?

Maybe we all need to email them!
Believe me, brother when I say, you don’t need anybody’s permission to send as many emails as you like.
Just please send them!
(They’ll read emails from non-residents too, I believe.)

I’m not a Michigan resident and never have been. Just like you I responded to this post with my thoughts. Guess I need your approval to write to lawmakers that have and never will make laws impacting my life.