Comments on: MI: Michigan Supreme Court to Look at Lifetime Registration

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:00:29 +0000

lol…we both caught that, I guess…

what is the road to hell paved with again? was it tootsie rolls? oh wait….nope it’s not tootsie rolls….

By: Scott

Scott — Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:56:31 +0000

I’m thinking that the state appeals court should have their logic checked. Let’s use this statement, and see if it makes any sense:

The central purpose of thalidomide is not intended to prevent children from developing limbs and giving them a 40% survival rate. Rather, it is meant to help with anxiety, insomnia and morning sickness.

After all, we’re just dealing with intentions, apparently.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:28:49 +0000

The Appeals court said:
“The central purpose of (the registry) is not intended to chastise, deter, or discipline ”
I’m sorry, but that statement is laughable with ” intended ” as a keyword. It may have not been intended, but the fact of the matter is, that is what it does. It’s like you’re in a boxing match and you say to your opponent: ” you see, I didn’t mean to pound on you to hurt you, but I’m a boxer and this is what we do “. lol. good intentions, no doubt, but the point of the matter is, you still get hurt.

2nd laughable statement by the Appeals:
“Rather, it is a remedial measure meant to protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public.”
Sounds like something the director of the CDC would say in a virus outbreak epidemic (in a Hollywood movie)
Now how and in what way would it do that ? Do you have any empirical evidence that it has been effective? To protect the general public even if the constitutional rights of us all are violated ? If it happened to a family member or a closed loved one of yours, would you still hold on to that statement ?

It is so easy to say something, In order to just quickly dismiss and move on to the next case. Seen it many times sitting in court. It’s a shame.