Comments on: New Scheduling Order in Ex Post Facto Plus Case

By: Truth hurts

Truth hurts — Thu, 02 Jul 2020 20:18:19 +0000

In reply to David. I don’t think they should bend the rules just for you. I commented about your off topic comments not FAC. Maybe just respect the rules and life will be a little easier on you. Don’t blame others for what you do.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:16:08 +0000

In reply to Jacob. They can do so anytime. That's still out there, but the fact that the judge didn't grant the State's request for a Stay means that the case is proceeding.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:14:55 +0000

At what point in this sequence of events does the court rule on FDLE’s motion to dismiss?

(Or, can they do so anytime, or not do so at all and default to allowing to proceed?)

By: diane

diane — Sat, 27 Jun 2020 18:42:18 +0000

This case is very important to right the wrongs done to people who took plea deals or other situations over 20 yrs ago.
Most of whom would have fought if they knew that after the fact their burden would illegally get harder on them.
Each small win is towards a bigger over all win. Please support this case as best you can

By: Jacob

Jacob — Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:42:26 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee. I found the matching info buried informally in the middle of an e-mail. Perhaps there are others who are unaware? Consider inserting some matching language under the thermometer on the webpage. Get that word out! We love our expert witnesses!

By: David

David — Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:41:18 +0000

In reply to Jacob. Policy is not staff. I recently posted off topic and my post is not listed now, nor can I respond to Policy. I am stifled by the local, state and federal governments, and now apparently by FAC. I will make no future posts or comments. Good luck to you all. Unsubscribed.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:53:09 +0000

In reply to ELAN MASTIN. Yes, it is.

By: Policy

Policy — Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:26:43 +0000

Then why post it here? Not saying it’s not important but I and many others donated a lot of money to this cause and come here for news on this case. It even says in the comment policy “Stay on topic”… maybe that policy was put in place so the subject matter would not get watered down such as what happened here. The last three comments has nothing to do with the Ex Post Facto case. Your topic deserves its own reporting and comment section because it is important but just not here as it doesn’t apply. I’ve been a member from the beginning and this seems to happen quite a bit.

By: ELAN MASTIN

ELAN MASTIN — Thu, 25 Jun 2020 03:42:51 +0000

I heard that there is someone who is matching donations to this cause? Is that still the case?

By: Jacob

Jacob — Thu, 25 Jun 2020 01:51:40 +0000

In reply to Shlepp Rock. In challenges such as these, you need to use the most sympathetic does available. Does your legal experience suggest otherwise? What do you see in the complaint to suggest that the does are inappropriate here?