I don’t cconverse with sick people

@Lucy

Glad you took valuable time out of your busy day to come and share your thoughts with us. I will notate your concerns. You were probably not even alive when I was arrested, that’s how long ago those accusations were made.
Come back anytime to share your frustrations about people on here you have never met and probably never will. If it makes you feel better, come back and tell me what you really think.

U all are sick..period

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/john-morgan-details-new-political-strategy-may-run-for-governor/ar-AA1CLUkC?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=LCTS&cvid=ffdda2f4e72144c0871168843e453c6f&ei=65

https://www.wesh.com/article/florida-assistant-principal-arrested-asking-student-rub-her-feet/64446041

The sex offence registry is either inherently dangerous or it is not. The consortium of they shouldn’t be allowed to report a thing as dangerous only when it affects those falsely accused unless we as a society agree that the inherent dangerousness of the registry is acceptable. And if we do, shouldn’t we then agree that an inherently dangerous policy should then be considered a punishment as punishments often harbor acceptably dangerous consequences to an offender?

It’s all about being defendable.

Ones ethnic background is defendable.
Ones gender is defendable.
Ones Religion is defendable.

But then we get into another area. Ones activities. Can ones activities be defendable? Sure. Being an employee or enjoying a hobby. These are activities that can be defendable.
But, can car jacking be defendable as an activity? How about thievery or robbery or sexual offending or murder?

We are not saying ‘ I cook hamburgers for a living so therefore I shouldn’t be discriminated against.’

We’re saying we did horrible things to people and we were punished.
If the carjacker can move forward after punishment and we were both released from our obligations to our government then why must society keep adding these arbitrary and capricious restrictions and irrational carve-outs?
But wait there’s more; “Least Restrictive Means test. When the Supreme court, in reviewing the constitutionality of legislation, uses the permissive rational basis standard, it demands only that a law be a rational means for achieving a legitimate governmental purpose.”
So if this logic is good enough for the rest of society then why not society’s pariahs?

From a song I wrote; “If I shoulda got life then I woulda got life.”

End this nonsensical madness.

The only good the sex offence registry ever did was to give politicians votes so they can restrict the lives of even more citizens.

The perpetual punishment the public allows and the vigilantes and trolls exploit, is despicable. We need to keep calling it out.

Two years, a knuckleheaded Republican here in VA tried to expand the registration to encompass years before the registry was born (1993) — so, basically the dawn of time. We mobilized and soundly defeated it.