Comments on: NJ Fights to Keep Tabs on Qualifying Sex Offenders

By: Kicked to the Curb.

Kicked to the Curb. — Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:43:40 +0000

“If it was not unfair to impose Megan’s Law on individuals who were convicted before Megan’s Law ever existed anywhere, then why is it fundamentally unfair in this situation,” Patterson asked.

Who ever said it wasn’t? Yes, the courts. Using highly subjective “Factors” to circumvent inconvenient strictures of the criminal Justice process, engaging in semantic games to adopt the “Civil” penalty label to avoid calling it what it is “PUNISHMENT”

Allow the additional individual due process as require by the 14th.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:59:24 +0000

In reply to R M.

Oral arguments were held yesterday in the supreme court, so there is no opinion yet.
The appellate order (from which the State appeals) is: https://njcourts.gov/attorneys/assets/opinions/webcast/a_38_18.pdf

By: beefstew327

beefstew327 — Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:58:11 +0000

common sense coming out of Jersey finally!

By: R M

R M — Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:49:16 +0000

Has the case been settled? What is the case name?