SAY NO TO VIOLENCE!

SAY YES TO REMOVING A PERSON’S QUALIFIED IMMUNITY STATUS AND SUE THE KNUCKLEHEAD IN CIVIL COURT….DRAIN THEIR WALLETS!

DRAIN THEIR FINANCIAL LIVES!

It’s your web site so you can frame reality however you like it. Plenty of websites do. I do wish they would all be more explicit in stating that they do and exactly how. Perhaps via very prominent “content” statements (e.g. “we don’t allow the discussion of ideas X, Y, or Z”)?

I expect you already know this but I was not encouraging violence. I was trying to discuss its impact.

People should already know that there has been serious violent retaliation for the Hit Lists (e.g. children have been murdered). I don’t think it made the Hit Lists “worse”. It did attract a lot of attention. It did allow smart people to see that the Hit Lists were not just worthless, but that they were a lot worse. Incredibly though, some criminal legislators said the cases were reasons why the Hit Lists needed to exist! The only thing I could figure out with that is that the legislators were shockingly stupid or that they thought most of the public is.

I could see how it could have a worse impact on the Hit Lists though. The fact is that most of the public truly does not care about facts. They truly don’t care if the Hit Lists cause innocent people to be murdered. They want vengeance and they want to feel good. I really think that is it. So nearly all bad things that happen to innocents due to the Hit Lists will just be shrugged off and the knuckle draggers who support the Hit Lists will just foam at the mouth more. They are a hateful mob with the main intent to only harass others. I mean, look at IML. What kind of moron would think that would be useful? It’s just for harassment and to satisfy truly dumb people.

*’to express such views’ damn auto-complete

When we target person(s) for violence based solely on the group they’re associated with (in this case, the Capitol Police), there’s a common word for that. I think we’re familiar with the term.

I reject the notion that this is a point of view that can be reasoned with. Using FAC’s platform to express sucks views, runs the risk of placing a target on FAC. They do not owe us a platform.

Also as a secondary thought. It’s not bad that others express their views that may not go along with mine . That way I have a chance to possibly express my views. Which hopefully can turn into a positive outcome for both. If someone has a biased view and is not allowed to express it how can that one be reasoned with to hopefully change that view.

Sorry you feel that way. FAC absolutely DOES NOT condone violence. It goes against our member code of conduct, “Any conduct that encourages or permits an offensive or hostile environment will not be tolerated.”
We disagree with your position, Will, and our site will not be a forum for encouraging violence.

Jacob
I agree. If it was someone on the registry, we would be done for. The retribution would be massive and wide spread, with new laws, compliance sweeps, harassment from law enforcement AND the public. Anything that puts us in the spotlight for something bad, is bad for ALL of us.
That is why everytime they do these fake stings and blast it across the news, I cringe. The neighbors watch the news and see that and then think that is a reminder that is time to refresh their kids memories of the creepy boogy man who lives 20 houses away.

We can agree to disagree. Tyrants deserve what they get.

Why not “put that on this platform”. Would you prefer that FAC expose only approved opinions? Prefer that people be lead to believe that certain opinions don’t exist? I feel FAC does do that to an extent and that gives an inaccurate understanding of reality.

Jacob
I agree to attack police or anyone using violence is NEVER going to accomplish anything good. Bad actions only beget bad results. We have to prove to them that we are better than that. They are the ones with the bad actions in the first place by establishing the registry. It is bad ,evil ,unjust ,discriminatory ,hateful , and only results in more evil. We are better than that and the ones who promoted it . We must prove that.

No it would not be good if a registrant attacked Capitol Police. Why would we even put that on this platform?