Odd. That interferes with your First Amendment rights. If criticism could be used for that it would meant that everyone online is being cyberstalked(?)

Damn straight. And they are quite unethical. They are very boldly and blatantly just stealing from taxpayers via Lauren’s Kids. That ought to be illegal.

I read somewhere that Book said that her compensation from that organization was not coming from the funds from the taxpayers but from donations, etc. Even if that is true it is still 100% unethical. Nothing but theft. They are crooks.

And is the father being paid from the organization. Think I read $138K per year, but don’t quote me on that. That would be unethical as well.

He is represented and his attorney would know better than us.

@ Chris
I hope you will be on the next membership call, we will talk then. Thanks for getting involved we need you.

My attorney said that the Book Crime Family could use anything I post critical of them as “cyberstalking.”

Others can only offer professional opinions and helpful criticisms. In the end only we are responsible for our choices. You gotta do what you feel is your best interest .

Floridians for Freedom Excellent informative site.

I agree. And my intent is to help fund litigation within an association or membership such as FAC. I do not have the way or means to go this alone. We should pick our fights carefully and put forth those plaintiffs that do no have priors dating back decades. They only serve to stain our argument and honestly some deserve to locked away for ever.

So than of those on this blog are there not 30 or 40 of us who, for lack of a better word, can “Cough Up” 1 or 2 thousand dollars for a agreed upon action?

I’m just getting started, involved

I have thought about the civility issue many, many times for over 2 decades now. And I’ve been civil and uncivil. I’ve found both useful.

Problem is that I’ve lost patience with these people. Their behavior stopped being acceptable years ago. And they are complete idiots to not remove some or all people from their glorious Registries much, much sooner than they think that should be considered. Really. Complete idiots.

So, I think it is fine to be respectful to respectable people. It is fine to be decent to decent people. But F people like the Books. They deserve one thing. Their behavior kills any and all empathy that I could have for them. So in that respect, I think the nanny was advance karma for their behavior – it was a heinous act done in advance to heinous people. So too bad for those harassers.

F the Books and people like them. Let them try to harass me more. I’ve proven I can beat them and that won’t stop. They will certainly suffer more than I will.

It is the tune of the conversation wherein our division lies. In attacking the messengers message, I have tremendous empathy for the horrific sexual abuse that Lauren Book experienced at the hands of her “LIVE IN” nanny. Can she explain how a registry or residency restriction would have prevented her assault?

I understand the pit from which both her and her Fathers bitter vindictive legislation wells up from. Hers, a feeling of betrayal, His a feeling of failure to protect. Neither have recovered and both our acting out against the “Monsters”.

My attorney said that the Book Crime Family could use anything I post critical of them as “cyberstalking.” However, I’m not going to stop criticizing those scumbags and I will continue to post criticism about them while the appeal is pending.

There are getting sued by someone they falsely accused of a sex crime so perhaps the people in that suit will use the info from the Floridians for Freedom blog.