<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OPPAGA “Sex Offender Registration and Monitoring Triennial Review” Falls Short of Expectations	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/oppaga-sex-offender-registration-and-monitoring-triennial-review-falls-short-of-expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/oppaga-sex-offender-registration-and-monitoring-triennial-review-falls-short-of-expectations/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:36:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: GL		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/oppaga-sex-offender-registration-and-monitoring-triennial-review-falls-short-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-46900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=17144#comment-46900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The legislature failed to define &quot;effectiveness&quot; within 943.04353.   While we anticipate the effectiveness would imply weighing if the registry is preventing sex offenses based on recidivism statistics and  whether it&#039;s an effective &quot;punitive deterrent&quot;.   They could have gone that way when the did their analysis.  Instead I think they are describing the effectiveness of law abiding registrants participating in the process with the gestapo.    They ignore the findings about out of state, dead and/or absconded  non-participating registrants because if you look at those numbers for those people, its effectiveness is dismal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legislature failed to define &#8220;effectiveness&#8221; within 943.04353.   While we anticipate the effectiveness would imply weighing if the registry is preventing sex offenses based on recidivism statistics and  whether it&#8217;s an effective &#8220;punitive deterrent&#8221;.   They could have gone that way when the did their analysis.  Instead I think they are describing the effectiveness of law abiding registrants participating in the process with the gestapo.    They ignore the findings about out of state, dead and/or absconded  non-participating registrants because if you look at those numbers for those people, its effectiveness is dismal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brandon		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/oppaga-sex-offender-registration-and-monitoring-triennial-review-falls-short-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-46899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=17144#comment-46899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would of been impressed if they actually stated whether Florida’s registry and restrictions work, however they didn’t even get out of the dugout.  Why is Florida wasting resources on registrants who don’t reside in Florida? Why are counties that have more ft added to the 1000ft rule not mentioned regarding homelessness?  Who are these members and who’s pockets are they in?  I have more questions than answers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would of been impressed if they actually stated whether Florida’s registry and restrictions work, however they didn’t even get out of the dugout.  Why is Florida wasting resources on registrants who don’t reside in Florida? Why are counties that have more ft added to the 1000ft rule not mentioned regarding homelessness?  Who are these members and who’s pockets are they in?  I have more questions than answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
