no funds are lost

I too am disappointed. I see the words “unfortunately” and I immediately become discouraged. I hope the $25k raised isn’t a waste due to a technicality. Will the attorney that realized this potential technicality continue with a new plaintiff, or will FAC need to spend months/years raising another $25k? I hope it’s the former rather than the latter.

Great, Brian. Thank you. You could be helping a great many of us! 👍🏻

Wasn’t his registration > 4 years ago?

Thanks David. I will definitely contact the Florida action committee and see if I can join the lawsuit.

LOL. Not according to Florida’s Registry! We are all the same according to the Registry.

@ Brian : You really need to contact Florida Action Committee as you may be the ideal client for their Out of State Registry lawsuit.

Seriously, please get in touch with them. A successful challenge could well free many of us who have long since moved from the State of Florida but are time barred from suing due to Florida’s f#cking statute of limitations. How does the statute of limitations apply when the punishment is continuous, ongoing, and unending?? There was no single point in time harm that occurred. Rather it is continuous and ongoing. If the harm has never ceased, how can there be a statute of limitations applicable to it?

Yes indeed, Bob. Because not a damn thing about the Registry and all its accompanying punishments, restrictions, requirements, etc. do a damn thing to PREVENT any sexual offense from ever occurring. If Registries successfully did that, then there wouldn’t be new individuals constantly added to the forever punishment lists.

Those schools are safe because they scan IDs for sex offenders at the door.

What I find that is all too common. But still messed up is the article talked about two different incidents with teachers and their 14 year old students. The female teach was being touted in the article as “innocent until proven guilty.” Where the part talking about the male teacher said nothing of the sort.