Comments on: PA Supreme Court Set to Hear Oral Arguments on Constitutionality of Registry

By: Josh N

Josh N — Thu, 05 Oct 2023 16:02:54 +0000

I believe this issue is much simpler than the government has made it. First offense sentence and such based on severity and of course some post release community control (no registry, just parole tailored to the offense committed.) SECOND OFFENSE perhaps extremely steep mandatory minimums or life.

By: Norman Achin

Norman Achin — Wed, 24 May 2023 13:51:11 +0000

In reply to Philip. I cover that in my reply to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and to the general accountability office for their ridiculous report about the stings and everything from the officers perspective

By: Philip

Philip — Wed, 24 May 2023 12:03:08 +0000

In reply to Norman M. Achin. Thank you! I keep hoping for better days ahead. My case felt worse than a sting. The officer kept harassing me no matter how many times I told her no and she was the one who contacted me not the other way around. They had to ask for permission to arrest me. I've been told that I've been railroaded big time. Then I learned recently about Wisconsin's supreme court and the influence of big business over courtroom functions. There was a conspiracy surrounding my case. Thank you for taking the time to listen and I greatly appreciate it.

By: Dale W

Dale W — Wed, 24 May 2023 00:50:42 +0000

In reply to Eugene V Debs. I sent the link to FAC about PARSOL's response to the hearing. Not even thinking about posting the link here. I listened to the hearing this morning and REALLY believe that we will prevail. Not sure what that will look like, but very hopeful. The Commonwealth attorney really had no clue what he was talking about. If you want to see what PARSOL siad, visit PARSOL.org . Maybe, just maybe PA can give birth to freedom for us again, just like 1776.

By: Norman M. Achin

Norman M. Achin — Tue, 23 May 2023 20:08:05 +0000

In reply to Philip.

Philip,
i am from MN and I sympathize. The registry is only a step — a big one. We must remove the sex stings and then, work on changing the Puritan culture that criminalizes anything from teen dating through accidental exposure or intellectual disabilities.

By: Norman Achin

Norman Achin — Tue, 23 May 2023 18:14:25 +0000

In reply to Norman M. Achin. Thanks. I need good news. I got this today from an employer:

By: Eugene V Debs

Eugene V Debs — Tue, 23 May 2023 17:16:40 +0000

In reply to Norman M. Achin.

It’s posted https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3xB9LwPC7EI

By: Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs — Tue, 23 May 2023 15:53:06 +0000

In reply to Norman M. Achin.

I would check this link out at the end of the day to see if they posted it once the days court cases our over.

https://m.youtube.com/@SupremeCtofPAOfficial/streams

By: Norman M. Achin

Norman M. Achin — Tue, 23 May 2023 15:33:23 +0000

In reply to Eugene V Debs. I appreciate your filling us all in, as I forgot to listen! Damn. Still, your rendition is a bit confusing, for those of us who haven't followed this so closely. Is there a recording someplace? Perhaps on the PA Supreme Ct. website.

By: Eugene V Debs

Eugene V Debs — Tue, 23 May 2023 15:28:01 +0000

Ok so from what I could tell defense was only kept saying high 20% recidivism rate and it’s a legislative issue.

Our side seemed well advised with our issues but mainly was bombarded with what happens with felon and gun rights, if you win. One of the judges mentioned what happens when the consensus change using Galileo as an example tho i could be potentially reading to much into that.

Seems there trying to see how they can unwind this law with out opening a can of worm with other people using this case as precedent.

One of the judges seem to struggle with striking the law vs individual assessments at one point so that could be a compromise. They also question why they used right to reputation.

I read somewhere they will announce their decisions in the fall around November