Well WF$ T.V slanted 9 told a similar tale but said ” Murderers and those convicted of Sexual Assault ” lending credence to the false notion that everyone on the registry is a rapist.

Just my personal opinion, but in many conversations one side bases his opinion on fact and the other side on emotion. When fact and emotion come into conflict the path leads nowhere. As I once heard, when you come to a fork in the road, take it.

I remember the debates over the Fairness doctrine reminds me of the uproar over social media posts. Explains why today you can’t have a civil conversation with anybody that opposes your view.

So it looks like in 2011 the law makers made it as to where news media can twist a story to their liking to make it MORE shocking regardless of who it hurts, without any repercussions. Again, they took Ex Sex offenders and turned it into rapists. #1 Not all on the registry are / were rapists.
#2 Even someone convicted of rape 20 years ago does not mean they are still a rapist.
What happened to the term “EX offenders” ? I will tell you that I believe, in my opinion, that the law makers do not like the fact that we have a chance to ever get out of jail/prison. So they use the registry as life time punishment, just without admitting it is punishment, since that would rule it unconstitutional.

Now you know why we have push back from DEEP pocketed politicians who if had their way, we would all be burned at the stake in a public square in front of the media.

Everyone, Stay Safe and Healthy!

What is disabled? I clicked the link you have in your comment and takes you to the same article with the same Rapist paragraph. 2nd to last paragraph. Please clarify “What” was disabled???

The 2018 ballot measure, known as Amendment 4, does not apply to convicted murderers and rapists, who are permanently barred from voting regardless of financial obligations.

Orange County elections supervisor Bill Cowles said he expects this November could be one of the highest voter turnouts in the state and for Orange County despite the pandemic and they’re working a plan now to keep poll workers and voters safe.

#1 Someone who was charged with looking at porn is not charged with rape.
#2 Someone who Exposed themselves is not charged with rape.
#3 Someone who Met an undercover officer and never did anything other than project they might want to meet someone underage is not a charge of rape.

I could on and on but it is obvious that sensationalism sells news, but at our expense. I guess they think all adjectives can be used interchangeably. Pervert, Sicko, Rapist, etc etc.
I guess a shoplifter can now be called a Robber?

I had to share and was hoping it would get printed on here because my blood boiled when I read the article taking a dirty jab at us.

Nicely stated Capt. Munsey. Thanks!