Donna
I agree that Facebook can be a huge waste of time and it takes effort to keep it contained. But I think it would be helpful for my situation where I have kids and grandchildren spread out over 4 States and they would love for me to keep in touch through it since they are all on it.

Derek
I heard on the news today about a recent study that reversed their opinions on the benefits of public media., especially for those with mental or emotional problems, Now saying social media is beneficial and helps them react with others benefiting them and helping them cope with there problems. I didn’t catch where the study was from. Could that information be of any benefit in action against facebooks bigoted stand.

1) Stand by their claim that they are a private company and can decide who can use their software.
2) Allow municipal accounts whereby citizens are informed of city ordinances.
Once Facebook allows government agencies to have accounts it become government speech and must be accessible to all, otherwise it is not free speech.
Other problems are: Even if Facebook would have a reason to ban a user, Facebook’s removal of the wall restricts other people’s free speech.
For example: Assume a controversial political figure such as Reverend Jesse Jackson is removed from Facebook along with every post he ever made. Facebook also removes the ‘wall’ limiting the free speech of everyone who posted comments regarding him.
Other problems: Assume you are convicted of a sex crime but your case is in appeals. You could prove you are innocent because there is a Facebook post of you at a large party at the time of the crime. Once you are removed from Facebook, you do not have access to the evidence to prove your innocence.

Twitter is just as bad. I find that my recent exile from Twitter has been a blessing in disguise. Even a number of fellow registrants act like self-righteous jerks online and I recently removed a number of activists from my networks because of their recent behavior.

In this case, it was Trump, a government agent, blocking people. Facebook is a private entity. A suit against Facebook would have a different vibe, more along the lines of the gay wedding cake case because it would be about how far a person can be allowed to deny a service based upon specific beliefs.

Facebook only made the registrant ban for plausible deniability reasons and the rules can be merely circumvented by making an alias and not posting pics.

I do speculate that the Matthew Shepherd Hate Crimes law that Obama signed when it was attached to the NDAA could be useful in a Facebook lawsuit, because if you target a person based upon your belief has a certain disability like a mental illness, then it is a hate crime. That means a person who targets a registered person because he believes that person to be a pedophile, which is classified as a mental disease, then that person committed a hate crime. Louisiana charged a vigilante with a hate crime for using registry info.

But that is merely my hypothesis.

Thanks Sarah – you can donate to our general legal fund.

I am ready to help financially if ever such a national fund is started. I think these medieval ordinances would fall like dominos. There is great power in numbers. Nowhere in the constitution did out forefathers grant permission for what is happening in our country today.

I know that there are some that are atheists or have doubts about God’s existence along with His Son, Jesus Christ, but He has revealed many times over for me His unlimited love, grace, and power. Without Him we can do nothing, but with Him we can do anything. Therefore, I am praying fervently for the registry, along with all of its draconian ordinances, to be blown apart.

Maybe if Janice ever gets a break in CA she could do it and most likely it would be a sure win