<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Private Companies now Violating 1st Amendment Rights of Citizens Forced to Register	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/private-companies-now-violating-1st-amendment-rights-of-citizens-forced-to-register/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/private-companies-now-violating-1st-amendment-rights-of-citizens-forced-to-register/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/private-companies-now-violating-1st-amendment-rights-of-citizens-forced-to-register/comment-page-1/#comment-35388</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=13888#comment-35388</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Facebook&#039;s ban just has the appearance of banning RSOs. Since using Facebook is not illegal, RSO are always free to post from the Facebook accounts created by our friends and relatives. In fact, impostors have created accounts pretending to be me for years attempting to reach out to my actual Facebook friends to add them to the impostor account. Facebook did nothing. Even when Facebook &#039;deletes&#039; an account, RSOs still are notified which Meetup.com members are your Facebook friends from &#039;deleted&#039; account.  Tip, use fresh device that has never been associated with RSO&#039;s email address when logging into Facebook accounts your friends create. Use VPN.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook&#8217;s ban just has the appearance of banning RSOs. Since using Facebook is not illegal, RSO are always free to post from the Facebook accounts created by our friends and relatives. In fact, impostors have created accounts pretending to be me for years attempting to reach out to my actual Facebook friends to add them to the impostor account. Facebook did nothing. Even when Facebook &#8216;deletes&#8217; an account, RSOs still are notified which Meetup.com members are your Facebook friends from &#8216;deleted&#8217; account.  Tip, use fresh device that has never been associated with RSO&#8217;s email address when logging into Facebook accounts your friends create. Use VPN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TheTruthHurts		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/private-companies-now-violating-1st-amendment-rights-of-citizens-forced-to-register/comment-page-1/#comment-35387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTruthHurts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=13888#comment-35387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To Whom that Penned the above, Fantastic Dialogue!

The awesome quote here is:

&quot;But Packingham only found that the state cannot broadly limit access, not that private companies cannot limit access.&quot;
(which is a violation of the US Constitution&#039;s Commerce Clause and creates Bills of Attainder)

I am not a Gamer (Asteroids and Pac Man were the games within I was maturated), so Fortnight means nothing to me.

The Thought Process above is what should be understood and accepted!

Thank You Again!

This is another addition, to the Oral Arguments that will be presented to the Chosen Few!  We Knew this prior to, but, NOW there is a presiding Quasi-Precedent!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Whom that Penned the above, Fantastic Dialogue!</p>
<p>The awesome quote here is:</p>
<p>&#8220;But Packingham only found that the state cannot broadly limit access, not that private companies cannot limit access.&#8221;<br />
(which is a violation of the US Constitution&#8217;s Commerce Clause and creates Bills of Attainder)</p>
<p>I am not a Gamer (Asteroids and Pac Man were the games within I was maturated), so Fortnight means nothing to me.</p>
<p>The Thought Process above is what should be understood and accepted!</p>
<p>Thank You Again!</p>
<p>This is another addition, to the Oral Arguments that will be presented to the Chosen Few!  We Knew this prior to, but, NOW there is a presiding Quasi-Precedent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
