They not only make the rules , but some force you to jump through hoops without any relevance to your conviction under threat of returning you to prison.

1) They do NOT help you. They’re hoping for a reason to violate you.

2) If you opt for a longer prison sentence, you can request no probation and they usually grant your plea request.

3) The probation officers consider you a “danger” for the duration of your probation period. If the judge sentences you to 1 month of probation, you’re dangerous and have to follow their ridiculous rules for 1 month. Whatever the probation sentence length is, that’s how long you’re apparently a threat. It’s ridiculous.

K Wolf:
“for me game of thrones was perfectly fine, along with anything rated R or under, as long as i would not self pleasuring my self while watching”

So, basically you’re ok with the idea that these Cracker Jack therapists are dehumanizing you. That’s lovely! Now ask them if they’ve EVER “pleasured themselves” at ANY point in their entire existence and they’ll tell you “it’s not about me”, which is a “yes”. So therefore, anyone who masturbates is GOING to commit a sex crime.
You should really think about how much you’ve been brainwashed.

With all due respect to k. wolf and his first amendment right to freely express his opinions, this is a BIG win for the U.S. Constitution. If the state or federal governments can enforce vague or arbitrary laws, then my comments as well as k. wolf’s and all others are subject to infringement.

What about the person who is not in therapy, but still under the requirement? What about the rogue probation officer who wants to violate a person’s probation over a wife’s Victoria’s Secret catalog? A ruling like this helps to avoid being arrested for any ole reason and, since rights are being taken away and with punishment being jail you’re damn right the State better be more specific and not put the decision in the hands of those who would abuse it especially, if determined by a polygraph (which is not accurate, btw. The law does not require a polygraph in order to violate, arrest and go to jail and a therapist has no power to prevent a thing). This decision does not hurt any process that you seem so satisfied with. You’ve just been lucky so far, is all.

every parole officer and corrections officer use a therapist to outline the rule of the pornographic materials for every individual.
Example:
for me game of thrones was perfectly fine, along with anything rated R or under, as long as i would not self pleasuring my self while watching.

Some people with a history of in ability to control sexual urges would be restricted to PG-13 and under.

however some people who had a strong affinity to children were restricted from having toy-r-us catalogs or watching movies with strong children lead roles where they admit they would pleasure themselves while watching.

The way they convict people is with a polygraph on the question “out side of what your therapist has allowed have you viewed any pornographic material”

I triggered covenant eyes several times and never had a conviction after a small investigations. this was due to the nature of my work and passing a polygraph.

everything in this state is risk based not sentenced based, a ruling like this ultimately hurts this process.